Suppr超能文献

慢性非恶性肌肉骨骼疼痛的触发点注射:一项系统评价

Trigger point injections for chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review.

作者信息

Scott N Ann, Guo Bing, Barton Pamela M, Gerwin Robert D

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):54-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00526.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review assessed the available published evidence on the efficacy and safety of using trigger point injection (TPI) to treat patients with chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain that had persisted for at least 3 months.

METHODS

All published systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials detailing the use of TPI in patients with chronic, non-malignant musculoskeletal pain (persisting for >3 months) were identified by systematically searching literature databases and the Websites of various health technology assessment agencies, research registers, and guidelines sites up to July 2006.

RESULTS

Although no systematic reviews were identified, 15 peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. However, deficiencies in reporting, small sample sizes, and marked inter-study heterogeneity precluded a definitive synthesis of the data. TPI is a safe procedure when used by clinicians with appropriate expertise and training. It relieved symptoms when used as a sole treatment for patients with chronic head, neck, shoulder, and back pain or whiplash syndrome, regardless of the injectant used, and may be a useful adjunct to intra-articular injection in the treatment of osteoarthritis pain. Although the addition of TPI to stretching exercises augments treatment outcomes, this was also true of other therapies such as ultrasound and laser.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of TPI is no more certain than it was a decade ago as, overall, there is no clear evidence of either benefit or ineffectiveness. The only advantage of injecting anesthetic into trigger points may be to reduce the pain of the needling process, which may not be an insignificant benefit.

摘要

目的

本系统评价评估了已发表的关于使用触发点注射(TPI)治疗持续至少3个月的慢性非恶性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的疗效和安全性的现有证据。

方法

通过系统检索文献数据库以及各卫生技术评估机构、研究登记处和指南网站直至2006年7月的网站,确定了所有详细描述TPI用于慢性非恶性肌肉骨骼疼痛(持续超过3个月)患者的已发表系统评价或随机对照试验。

结果

虽然未检索到系统评价,但有15项经同行评审的随机对照试验符合纳入标准。然而,报告中的缺陷、样本量小以及研究间显著的异质性妨碍了对数据进行确定性的综合分析。当由具有适当专业知识和培训的临床医生使用时,TPI是一种安全的操作。无论使用何种注射剂,将其作为慢性头痛、颈部、肩部和背部疼痛或挥鞭样综合征患者的单一治疗方法时,均可缓解症状,并且在治疗骨关节炎疼痛时,它可能是关节内注射的有用辅助手段。虽然在伸展运动中添加TPI可增强治疗效果,但超声和激光等其他疗法也有同样效果。

结论

TPI的疗效并不比十年前更确定,总体而言,没有明确证据表明其有益或无效。向触发点注射麻醉剂的唯一好处可能是减轻针刺过程中的疼痛,这可能是一个不可忽视的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验