• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康促进中可持续合作的诊断——一项案例研究

Diagnosis of sustainable collaboration in health promotion - a case study.

作者信息

Leurs Mariken T W, Mur-Veeman Ingrid M, van der Sar Rosalie, Schaalma Herman P, de Vries Nanne K

机构信息

Youth Department, Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, PO Box 93245; 2509 AE The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2008 Nov 7;8:382. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-382.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-8-382
PMID:18992132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2605462/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Collaborations are important to health promotion in addressing multi-party problems. Interest in collaborative processes in health promotion is rising, but still lacks monitoring instruments. The authors developed the DIagnosis of Sustainable Collaboration (DISC) model to enable comprehensive monitoring of public health collaboratives. The model focuses on opportunities and impediments for collaborative change, based on evidence from interorganizational collaboration, organizational behavior and planned organizational change. To illustrate and assess the DISC-model, the 2003/2004 application of the model to the Dutch whole-school health promotion collaboration is described.

METHODS

The study combined quantitative research, using a cross-sectional survey, with qualitative research using the personal interview methodology and document analysis. A DISC-based survey was sent to 55 stakeholders in whole-school health promotion in one Dutch region. The survey consisted of 22 scales with 3 to 8 items. Only scales with a reliability score of 0.60 were accepted. The analysis provided for comparisons between stakeholders from education, public service and public health.The survey was followed by approaching 14 stakeholders for a semi-structured DISC-based interview. As the interviews were timed after the survey, the interviews were used to clarify unexpected and unclear outcomes of the survey as well.Additionally, a DISC-based document analysis was conducted including minutes of meetings, project descriptions and correspondence with schools and municipalities.

RESULTS

Response of the survey was 77% and of the interviews 86%. Significant differences between respondents of different domains were found for the following scales: organizational characteristics scale, the change strategies, network development, project management, willingness to commit and innovative actions and adaptations. The interviews provided a more specific picture of the state of the art of the studied collaboration regarding the DISC-constructs.

CONCLUSION

The DISC-model is more than just the sum of the different parameters provided in the literature on interorganizational collaboration, organization change, networking and setting-approaches. Monitoring a collaboration based on the DISC-model yields insight into windows of opportunity and current impediments for collaborative change. DISC-based monitoring is a promising strategy enabling project managers and social entrepreneurs to plan change management strategies systematically.

摘要

背景

合作对于解决多方问题的健康促进至关重要。健康促进领域对合作过程的兴趣日益浓厚,但仍缺乏监测工具。作者开发了可持续合作诊断(DISC)模型,以全面监测公共卫生合作。该模型基于组织间合作、组织行为和有计划的组织变革的证据,关注合作变革的机遇和障碍。为了说明和评估DISC模型,本文描述了该模型在2003/2004年荷兰全校健康促进合作中的应用情况。

方法

本研究将使用横断面调查的定量研究与采用个人访谈方法和文档分析的定性研究相结合。向荷兰一个地区全校健康促进领域的55名利益相关者发送了基于DISC的调查问卷。该问卷由22个量表组成,每个量表包含3至8个项目。仅接受信度得分在0.60及以上的量表。分析用于比较教育、公共服务和公共卫生领域的利益相关者。调查之后,对14名利益相关者进行了基于DISC的半结构化访谈。由于访谈在调查之后进行,因此访谈也用于澄清调查中意外和不明确的结果。此外,还进行了基于DISC的文档分析,包括会议记录、项目描述以及与学校和市政当局的通信。

结果

调查的回复率为77%,访谈的回复率为86%。在以下量表上发现不同领域的受访者之间存在显著差异:组织特征量表、变革策略、网络发展、项目管理、承诺意愿以及创新行动与适应。访谈提供了关于所研究合作在DISC结构方面的更具体的现状描述。

结论

DISC模型不仅仅是组织间合作、组织变革、网络建设和环境方法等文献中提供的不同参数的总和。基于DISC模型对合作进行监测,可以洞察合作变革的机遇之窗和当前障碍。基于DISC的监测是一种有前景的策略,能使项目经理和社会企业家系统地规划变革管理策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5026/2605462/bd92b5e99789/1471-2458-8-382-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5026/2605462/bd92b5e99789/1471-2458-8-382-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5026/2605462/bd92b5e99789/1471-2458-8-382-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnosis of sustainable collaboration in health promotion - a case study.健康促进中可持续合作的诊断——一项案例研究
BMC Public Health. 2008 Nov 7;8:382. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-382.
2
Development of a collaborative model to improve school health promotion in The Netherlands.荷兰改善学校健康促进合作模式的发展
Health Promot Int. 2005 Sep;20(3):296-305. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai004. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
3
Effectiveness of a systematic approach to promote intersectoral collaboration in comprehensive school health promotion-a multiple-case study using quantitative and qualitative data.一种系统性方法在促进综合学校健康促进中的部门间合作的有效性——一项使用定量和定性数据的多案例研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 5;15:613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1911-2.
4
A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations.医疗保健组织中专业人员之间合作的模型与类型学
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 21;8:188. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-188.
5
Local health policy development processes in the Netherlands: an expanded toolbox for health promotion.荷兰地方卫生政策制定流程:促进健康的扩展工具箱
Health Promot Int. 2007 Jun;22(2):112-21. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam009. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
6
Strengthening the capacity for health promotion in South Africa through international collaboration.通过国际合作加强南非的健康促进能力。
Glob Health Promot. 2010 Jun;17(2 Suppl):6-16. doi: 10.1177/1757975910363923.
7
Partnership lessons from the Global Programme for Health Promotion Effectiveness: a case study.全球健康促进有效性计划的伙伴关系经验教训:一项案例研究
Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):365-71. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan029. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
8
Operative links: the importance of combining perspectives in municipal strategies aimed at children's and adolescents' health.手术环节:在旨在促进儿童和青少年健康的市政策略中结合不同视角的重要性。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Jun;40(4):348-54. doi: 10.1177/1403494812449519.
9
[Subtainable health promotion via organisational development--a model project for teachers in professional training schools].通过组织发展实现可持续健康促进——职业培训学校教师的一个示范项目
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Feb;67(2):141-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-857878.
10
[Development and evaluation of the reliability and validity of an empowerment scale for health promotion volunteers].[健康促进志愿者赋权量表的信效度开发与评价]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011 Aug;58(8):617-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectoral Partnerships Between Local Governments and Health Organisations in High-Income Contexts: A Scoping Review.高收入国家中地方政府与卫生组织之间的跨部门伙伴关系:范围综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7841. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7841. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
2
Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review.卫生系统跨部门合作机制:一项范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Nov;52(11):2299-2312. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i11.14030.
3
Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Forming, managing and sustaining alliances for health promotion.
Health Promot J Austr. 2005 Aug;16(2):138-43. doi: 10.1071/he05138.
2
Quality of research on community partnerships: developing the evidence base.社区伙伴关系的研究质量:建立证据基础。
Health Educ Res. 2006 Apr;21(2):175-80. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh051. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
3
Why do health and social care providers co-operate?医疗和社会护理服务提供者为何要合作?
Health Policy. 2005 Sep 28;74(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.12.006. Epub 2005 Jan 11.
健康促进领域跨部门合作的基本标准、模式及指标:一项范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):852-865. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6103.
4
A Systematic Review of Key Factors in the Effectiveness of Multisector Alliances in the Public Health Domain.公共卫生领域多部门联盟有效性关键因素的系统评价
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1177/0890117120928789. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
A catalyst for system change: a case study of child health network formation, evolution and sustainability in Canada.系统变革的催化剂:加拿大儿童健康网络形成、发展与可持续性的案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2018-5.
6
Effectiveness of a systematic approach to promote intersectoral collaboration in comprehensive school health promotion-a multiple-case study using quantitative and qualitative data.一种系统性方法在促进综合学校健康促进中的部门间合作的有效性——一项使用定量和定性数据的多案例研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 5;15:613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1911-2.
7
Buffer management to solve bed-blocking in the Netherlands 2000-2010. Cooperation from an integrated care chain perspective as a key success factor for managing patient flows.2000-2010 年荷兰的床位阻塞问题的缓冲区管理。从整合照护链的角度来看,合作是管理病患流量的关键成功因素。
Int J Integr Care. 2011 Jan;11(Spec 10th Anniversary Ed):e080. doi: 10.5334/ijic.650. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
4
Social networks and community prevention coalitions.社交网络与社区预防联盟。
J Prim Prev. 2005 Jul;26(4):279-98. doi: 10.1007/s10935-005-5390-4.
5
Developmental stages in public health partnerships: a practical perspective.公共卫生伙伴关系中的发展阶段:实践视角
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):219-26. doi: 10.1177/1524839903260647.
6
The National Public Health Leadership Institute: evaluation of a team-based approach to developing collaborative public health leaders.国家公共卫生领导力研究所:基于团队的协作式公共卫生领导者培养方法评估
Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):641-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047993.
7
Development of a collaborative model to improve school health promotion in The Netherlands.荷兰改善学校健康促进合作模式的发展
Health Promot Int. 2005 Sep;20(3):296-305. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai004. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
8
Development of measures of organizational leadership for health promotion.促进健康的组织领导力衡量标准的制定。
Health Educ Behav. 2005 Apr;32(2):195-207. doi: 10.1177/1090198104271970.
9
What's the place of schools in promoting health? Are we too optimistic?
Health Promot Int. 2004 Dec;19(4):405-8. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah401. Epub 2004 Nov 9.
10
Program sustainability: focus on organizational routines.
Health Promot Int. 2004 Dec;19(4):489-500. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah411. Epub 2004 Nov 1.