Sajatovic Martha, Jenkins Janis H, Cassidy Kristin A, Muzina David J
Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jun;115(3):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
Subjective experience of illness affects outcomes among populations with bipolar disorder (BD). This cross-sectional study combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to evaluate perceived treatment effects, concerns and expectations among 90 individuals with BD.
Adults with Type I BD, mean age 36.6 years, 51% women, completed a semi-structured interview that was audio taped, transcribed, coded and analyzed along emergent themes. Quantitative scales measured depressive symptoms (Hamilton Depression Scale/HAM-D), psychopathology (Clinical Global Impression/CGI), and insight and treatment attitudes (Insight and Treatment Attitudes Questionnaire/ITAQ).
Individuals had moderate depression and psychopathology with good insight into need for treatment. Drug treatment was perceived as beneficial, by "stabilizing" or "balancing" mood (42%, N=38), decreasing anxiety/depressive symptoms (19%, N=17) and improving sleep (10%, N=9). While 39%, (N=35) of individuals denied medication concerns, nearly 29%, (N=26) feared possible long-term effects, particularly diabetes or liver/kidney damage. Media stories and advertisements contributed to medication fears. Hopes and expectations for treatment ranged from those that were symptom or functional status-based, such as desiring mood stabilization and elimination of specific symptoms (23%, N=21), to more global hopes such as "being normal" (20%, N=18) or "cured" (18%, N=16).
Limitations include relatively small sample, lack of a comparator, inclusion of only depressed individuals and those willing to discuss their illness experience.
While individuals with BD appreciate the effects of medications, concerns regarding adverse effects and discrepancy between actual and hoped-for outcomes can be substantial. Subjective experience with medications using qualitative and quantitative methods should be explored in order to optimize treatment collaboration and outcomes.
疾病的主观体验会影响双相情感障碍(BD)人群的治疗结果。这项横断面研究结合了定性和定量方法,以评估90名双相情感障碍患者对治疗效果的感知、担忧和期望。
平均年龄为36.6岁的I型双相情感障碍成年患者,其中51%为女性,完成了一次半结构化访谈,访谈内容进行了录音、转录、编码,并根据出现的主题进行分析。定量量表测量抑郁症状(汉密尔顿抑郁量表/HAM-D)、精神病理学(临床总体印象/CGI)以及洞察力和治疗态度(洞察力和治疗态度问卷/ITAQ)。
患者存在中度抑郁和精神病理学问题,对治疗需求有较好的洞察力。药物治疗被认为是有益的,通过“稳定”或“平衡”情绪(42%,N = 38)、减轻焦虑/抑郁症状(19%,N = 17)以及改善睡眠(10%,N = 9)。虽然39%(N = 35)的患者否认对药物有担忧,但近29%(N = 26)的患者担心可能的长期影响,尤其是糖尿病或肝/肾损伤。媒体报道和广告加剧了对药物的恐惧。对治疗的希望和期望范围从基于症状或功能状态的,如希望情绪稳定和消除特定症状(23%,N = 21),到更全面的希望,如“恢复正常”(20%,N = 18)或“治愈”(18%,N = 16)。
局限性包括样本相对较小、缺乏对照、仅纳入了抑郁患者以及愿意讨论其疾病经历的患者。
虽然双相情感障碍患者认识到药物的作用,但对不良反应的担忧以及实际结果与期望结果之间的差异可能很大。应采用定性和定量方法探索药物治疗的主观体验,以优化治疗合作及治疗结果。