Suppr超能文献

偏差:研究实践的考量因素

Bias: considerations for research practice.

作者信息

Gerhard Tobias

机构信息

Center for Education and Research on Mental Health Therapeutics, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, and Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Nov 15;65(22):2159-68. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070369.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The concept of bias and its effects on study results are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Understanding bias is paramount for the conduct of sound research studies. In the context of research methodology, bias refers to the presence of systematic error in a study. This report serves as an introduction to the concept of bias and describes three major areas through which bias is introduced into research studies of health care interventions: (1) factors that relate to the exposure of patients to treatments in the population, (2) factors that influence inclusion of patients in the study, and (3) factors related to assessment and measurement. Methods to address bias in both design and analysis stages of a study are presented, including restriction, matching, multivariate analysis, instrumental variable estimation, and the prevention of misclassification of information. While some biases are specific to certain study designs and approaches, the general concepts of how bias is introduced into a study apply equally to randomized controlled trials, prospective observational or quasiexperimental studies, and retrospective studies. An important difference between the designs is how much opportunity the investigator has to avoid bias and influence accuracy of measurements, ranging from ideally full control in randomized controlled trials to almost no control in retrospective studies of automated databases.

CONCLUSION

Investigators should aim to avoid bias in the design of a study, adjust for bias in the study analysis if bias cannot feasibly be avoided, and quantify and discuss the effects of residual bias on study results.

摘要

目的

综述偏倚的概念及其对研究结果的影响。

总结

理解偏倚对于开展合理的研究至关重要。在研究方法学背景下,偏倚指研究中存在的系统误差。本报告作为偏倚概念的介绍,描述了将偏倚引入医疗保健干预研究的三个主要方面:(1)与人群中患者接受治疗的暴露情况相关的因素;(2)影响患者纳入研究的因素;(3)与评估和测量相关的因素。介绍了在研究的设计和分析阶段处理偏倚的方法,包括限制、匹配、多变量分析、工具变量估计以及防止信息错误分类。虽然某些偏倚特定于某些研究设计和方法,但偏倚如何引入研究的一般概念同样适用于随机对照试验、前瞻性观察性或半实验性研究以及回顾性研究。这些设计之间的一个重要区别在于研究者避免偏倚和影响测量准确性的机会有多少,从随机对照试验中理想的完全控制到自动数据库回顾性研究中几乎没有控制。

结论

研究者应旨在在研究设计中避免偏倚,如果无法切实避免偏倚,则在研究分析中对偏倚进行调整,并量化和讨论残余偏倚对研究结果的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验