van Strijp A J P, Gerardu V A M, Buijs M J, van Loveren C, ten Cate J M
Department of Cariology, Endodontology, Pedodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caries Res. 2008;42(6):460-5. doi: 10.1159/000170587. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
Clinical studies on the caries-preventive properties of chlorhexidine mouthrinses are limited and the results are inconclusive.
The aim of this study was to elucidate the contribution of a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse to the protection of enamel and dentine against demineralization.
In this randomized two-treatment, two-leg study 14 individuals wearing partial prostheses were enrolled. Sound enamel and dentine specimens were placed in situ for 4 weeks. Twice daily, a mouthrinse was performed with either chlorhexidine or saline (control) depending on the experimental group the participant was allocated to. After the experimental period, plaque samples were collected from the surface of the specimens and from natural tooth surfaces to assess the organic acid production upon a sucrose challenge. The specimens were analyzed for mineral loss by transversal microradiography.
This study could not demonstrate a significantly better protection of enamel and dentine against demineralization by the chlorhexidine treatment compared to saline. No differences in acid production of plaque samples from the chlorhexidine-treated and control groups were observed. This result was also found for plaque samples originating from the natural tooth surfaces.
Mouth rinsing with 0.2% chlorhexidine did not prevent demineralization of dentine and enamel in situ.
关于洗必泰漱口水防龋特性的临床研究有限,结果尚无定论。
本研究旨在阐明0.2%洗必泰漱口水对保护牙釉质和牙本质免受脱矿的作用。
在这项随机双治疗、双组研究中,招募了14名佩戴局部义齿的个体。将完好的牙釉质和牙本质标本原位放置4周。根据参与者被分配到的实验组,每天用洗必泰或生理盐水(对照)进行两次漱口。实验期结束后,从标本表面和天然牙表面收集菌斑样本,以评估蔗糖刺激后有机酸的产生。通过横向显微放射照相术分析标本的矿物质流失情况。
与生理盐水相比,本研究未能证明洗必泰治疗对牙釉质和牙本质的脱矿保护效果显著更好。在洗必泰治疗组和对照组的菌斑样本中未观察到酸产生的差异。天然牙表面的菌斑样本也得到了同样的结果。
用0.2%洗必泰漱口不能防止牙本质和牙釉质原位脱矿。