Endorf Frederick W, Klein Matthew B, Mack Christopher D, Jurkovich Gregory J, Rivara Frederick P
Harborview Medical Center and Harborview Injury Prevention Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104-2499, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(6):933-8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31818ba112.
Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTI) are often life-threatening illnesses that may be best treated at specialty care facilities such as burn centers. However, little is known about current treatment patterns nationwide. The purpose of this study was to describe the referral patterns for treatment of NSTI using a multistate discharge database and to investigate the differences in patients with NSTIs treated at burn centers and nonburn centers. The National Inpatient Sample is an all-payer inpatient database from 37 states containing data from 14 million hospital stays each year. We identified all patients with NSTI using International Classification of Disease version 9 codes for necrotizing fasciitis (728.86), gas gangrene (040.0), and Fournier's gangrene (608.83) for the years 2001 and 2004. Patients were dichotomized by location of definitive treatment--either burn centers or nonburn centers. Burn center status was ascertained from the current American Burn Association burn center directory. Patient characteristics, payer status, hospital course, mortality rates, and disposition were compared between patients treated at burn centers and nonburn centers. In 2001 and 2004, a total of 10,940 patients were identified as having a NSTI. The majority (87.1%) of these patients received definitive care at nonburn centers. Patients treated at burn centers were more likely to be transferred from another hospital (OR 2.0, CI 1.8-2.2) and were more likely to have Medicaid (22.6% vs 16.3%, OR 1.39) or be uninsured (18.8% vs 13.7%, OR 1.38). Patients treated at burn centers had more surgical procedures (4.6 vs 4.3, P < .01), and higher hospital charges ($101,800 vs $68,500, P < .01). Total length of stay was also longer at burn centers (22.1 vs 16.0 days, P < .01). Based on a national discharge database, the majority of patients with NSTI are treated at nonburn centers. However, patients treated at burn centers were more likely to be transferred from nonburn centers, had longer lengths of stay, and underwent more operations, all of which are likely attributable to a greater severity of infection.
坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)通常是危及生命的疾病,在烧伤中心等专科护理机构治疗可能效果最佳。然而,目前对于全国范围内的治疗模式知之甚少。本研究的目的是利用多州出院数据库描述NSTI的转诊模式,并调查在烧伤中心和非烧伤中心接受治疗的NSTI患者之间的差异。国家住院病人样本是一个来自37个州的全付费者住院数据库,每年包含1400万次住院数据。我们使用国际疾病分类第9版中坏死性筋膜炎(728.86)、气性坏疽(040.0)和福尼尔坏疽(608.83)的编码,确定了2001年和2004年所有患有NSTI的患者。患者根据最终治疗地点分为两类——烧伤中心或非烧伤中心。烧伤中心的状态从当前美国烧伤协会烧伤中心名录中确定。比较了在烧伤中心和非烧伤中心接受治疗的患者的特征、支付者状态、住院过程、死亡率和出院情况。在2001年和2004年,共有10940名患者被确定患有NSTI。这些患者中的大多数(87.1%)在非烧伤中心接受了最终治疗。在烧伤中心接受治疗的患者更有可能从另一家医院转诊(比值比2.0,可信区间1.8 - 2.2),更有可能有医疗补助(22.6%对16.3%,比值比1.39)或未参保(18.8%对13.7%,比值比1.38)。在烧伤中心接受治疗的患者接受的外科手术更多(4.6次对4.3次,P <.01),住院费用更高(101800美元对68500美元,P <.01)。烧伤中心的总住院时间也更长(22.1天对16.0天,P <.01)。基于全国出院数据库,大多数NSTI患者在非烧伤中心接受治疗。然而,在烧伤中心接受治疗的患者更有可能从非烧伤中心转诊,住院时间更长,接受的手术更多,所有这些可能都归因于感染的严重程度更高。