Suppr超能文献

对不同循环训练方案的急性生理反应。

Acute physiological responses to different circuit training protocols.

作者信息

Monteiro A G, Alveno D A, Prado M, Monteiro G A, Ugrinowitsch C, Aoki M S, Piçarro I C

机构信息

University City of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2008 Dec;48(4):438-42.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of present study was to compare the acute physiological responses to a circuit weight training with the responses to a combined circuit training (weight training and treadmill run).

METHODS

The sample consisted of 25 individuals at an average state of training, 10 men and 15 female, between 18 and 35 year old. There were selected 60 second sets of resistance exercises to the circuit weight training (CWT). Whereas in the combined circuit training (CCT), the subjects spent 30 seconds on the same resistance exercises and 30 seconds running on the treadmill. The rest intervals between the sets lasted 15 seconds. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) with 5% significance level was utilized to the statistical analysis of the results.

RESULTS

Comparing circuit training protocols, it was noted that CCT elicits a higher relative and absolute VO2 and energy expenditure values than CWT for both genders (P<0.05). Regarding inter-gender comparison, males showed higher absolute and relative VO2 and absolute energy expenditure values for both CWT and CCT than females (P<0.05). Females showed a significant greater %VO2max value for both CWT and CCT. Due to the experimental conditions used to state both circuit training bouts (CWT and CCT), the VO2 rate found was higher than the values reported by previous studies which used heavier weight lift.

CONCLUSION

CCT seems adequate to produce cardiovascular improvements and greater energy expenditure for both men and women, while CWT group classes are sufficient only for unfit women.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较循环重量训练与联合循环训练(重量训练和跑步机跑步)的急性生理反应。

方法

样本包括25名处于平均训练水平的个体,10名男性和15名女性,年龄在18至35岁之间。为循环重量训练(CWT)选择了60秒的阻力练习组。而在联合循环训练(CCT)中,受试者在相同的阻力练习上花费30秒,在跑步机上跑步30秒。组间休息间隔持续15秒。采用显著性水平为5%的方差分析(ANOVA)对结果进行统计分析。

结果

比较循环训练方案时,注意到对于男女两性,CCT引起的相对和绝对VO2以及能量消耗值均高于CWT(P<0.05)。关于性别间比较,男性在CWT和CCT中的绝对和相对VO2以及绝对能量消耗值均高于女性(P<0.05)。女性在CWT和CCT中的%VO2max值均显著更高。由于用于两种循环训练回合(CWT和CCT)的实验条件,所发现的VO2率高于先前使用更重重量举重的研究报告的值。

结论

CCT似乎足以改善男女两性的心血管功能并增加能量消耗,而CWT团体课程仅对身体不健康的女性足够。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验