Benito Pedro J, Alvarez-Sánchez María, Díaz Víctor, Morencos Esther, Peinado Ana B, Cupeiro Rocio, Maffulli Nicola
Department of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Institute of Veterinary Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0164349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164349. eCollection 2016.
The present study describes the oxygen uptake and total energy expenditure (including both aerobic and anaerobic contribution) response during three different circuit weight training (CWT) protocols of equivalent duration composed of free weight exercises, machine exercises, and a combination of free weight exercises intercalating aerobic exercise.
Controlled, randomized crossover designs.
Subjects completed in a randomized order three circuit weight training protocols of the same duration (3 sets of 8 exercises, 45min 15s) and intensity (70% of 15 repetitions maximum). The circuit protocols were composed of free weight exercises, machine exercises, or a combination of free weight exercises with aerobic exercise. Oxygen consumption and lactate concentration were measured throughout the circuit to estimate aerobic and anaerobic energy expenditure respectively.
Energy expenditure is higher in the combined exercise protocol (29.9±3.6 ml/kg/min), compared with Freeweight (24.2±2.8ml/kg/min) and Machine (20.4±2.9ml/kg/min). The combined exercise protocol produced the highest total energy expenditure but the lowest lactate concentration and perceived exertion. The anaerobic contribution to total energy expenditure was higher in the machine and free weight protocols compared with the combined exercise protocol (6.2%, 4.6% and 2.3% respectively).
In the proposed protocols, the combined exercise protocol results in the highest oxygen consumption. Total energy expenditure is related to the type of exercise included in the circuit. Anaerobic contributions to total energy expenditure during circuit weight training may be modest, but lack of their estimation may underestimate total energy expenditure.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01116856.
本研究描述了在三种持续时间相等、由自由重量练习、器械练习以及穿插有氧运动的自由重量练习组合而成的不同循环重量训练(CWT)方案中,摄氧量和总能量消耗(包括有氧和无氧贡献)的反应。
对照、随机交叉设计。
受试者以随机顺序完成三种相同持续时间(8组练习,每组3次,共45分15秒)和强度(15次重复最大值的70%)的循环重量训练方案。循环方案由自由重量练习、器械练习或自由重量练习与有氧运动的组合组成。在整个循环过程中测量耗氧量和乳酸浓度,分别估计有氧和无氧能量消耗。
与自由重量训练(24.2±2.8毫升/千克/分钟)和器械训练(20.4±2.9毫升/千克/分钟)相比,联合训练方案中的能量消耗更高(29.9±3.6毫升/千克/分钟)。联合训练方案产生的总能量消耗最高,但乳酸浓度和主观用力程度最低。与联合训练方案相比,器械训练和自由重量训练方案中无氧对总能量消耗的贡献更高(分别为6.2%、4.6%和2.3%)。
在所提出的方案中,联合训练方案导致最高的耗氧量。总能量消耗与循环中包含的运动类型有关。循环重量训练中无氧对总能量消耗的贡献可能不大,但缺乏对其的估计可能会低估总能量消耗。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01116856。