Ohlendorf Arne, Schaeffel Frank
Ophthalmic Research Institute, Section of Neurobiology of the Eye, Calwerstrasse, Tübingen, Germany.
Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(2):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
To describe some features of contrast adaptation as induced by imposed positive or negative defocus. To study its time course and selectivity for the sign of the imposed defocus.
Contrast adaptation, CA (here referred to as any change in supra-threshold contrast sensitivity) was induced by presenting a movie to the subjects on a computer screen at 1m distance for 10min, while the right eye was defocused by a trial lens (+4D (n=25); -4D (n=10); -2D (n=11 subjects). The PowerRefractor was used to track accommodation binocularly. Contrast sensitivity at threshold was measured by a method of adjustment with a Gabor patch of 1deg angular subtense, filled with 3.22cyc/deg sine wave grating presented on a computer screen at 1m distance on gray background (33cd/m(2)). Supra-threshold contrast sensitivity was quantified by an interocular contrast matching task, in which the subject had to match the contrast of the sine wave grating seen with the right eye with the contrast of a grating with fixed contrast of 0.1.
(1) Contrast sensitivity thresholds were not lowered by previous viewing of defocused movies. (2) By wearing positive lenses, the supra-threshold contrast sensitivity in the right eye was raised by about 30% and remained elevated for at least 2min until baseline was reached after about 5min. (3) CA was induced only by positive, but not by negative lenses, even after the distance of the computer screen was taken into account (1m, equivalent to +1D). In five subjects, binocular accommodation was tracked over the full adaptation period. Accommodation appeared to focus the eye not wearing a lens, but short transient switches in focus to the lens wearing eye could not be entirely excluded.
Transient contrast adaptation was found at 3.22cyc/deg when positive lenses were worn but not with negative lenses. This asymmetry is intriguing. While it may represent an epiphenomenon of physiological optics, further experiments are necessary to determine whether it could also trace back to differences in CA with defocus of different sign.
描述由施加的正或负离焦引起的对比度适应的一些特征。研究其时间进程以及对施加离焦符号的选择性。
通过在计算机屏幕上以1米的距离向受试者播放10分钟的电影来诱导对比度适应(CA,在此指阈上对比度敏感性的任何变化),同时用试验镜片使右眼产生离焦(+4D(n = 25); - 4D(n = 10); - 2D(n = 11名受试者)。使用PowerRefractor双眼跟踪调节。阈上对比度敏感性通过调整法测量,使用在1米距离的灰色背景(33cd/m²)上呈现的1度视角的Gabor斑块,其填充有3.22周/度的正弦波光栅。阈上对比度敏感性通过双眼对比度匹配任务进行量化,其中受试者必须将右眼看到的正弦波光栅的对比度与固定对比度为0.1的光栅的对比度相匹配。
(1)先前观看离焦电影并未降低对比度敏感性阈值。(2)佩戴正透镜时,右眼的阈上对比度敏感性提高了约30%,并至少保持升高2分钟,直到约5分钟后达到基线。(3)即使考虑了计算机屏幕的距离(1米,相当于 + 1D),CA仅由正透镜诱导,而非负透镜。在五名受试者中,在整个适应期内跟踪了双眼调节。调节似乎使未戴透镜的眼睛聚焦,但不能完全排除短暂的焦点短暂切换到戴透镜的眼睛。
佩戴正透镜时在3.22周/度发现了短暂的对比度适应,而佩戴负透镜时未发现。这种不对称性很有趣。虽然它可能代表生理光学的一种附带现象,但需要进一步实验来确定它是否也可追溯到不同符号离焦时CA的差异。