Stevens Sara A, West Greg L, Al-Aidroos Naseem, Weger Ulrich W, Pratt Jay
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1148-53. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1148.
It has been suggested that two types of uninformative central cues produce reflexive orienting: gaze and arrow cues. Using the criterion that voluntary shifts of attention facilitate both response speed and perceptual accuracy, whereas reflexive shifts of attention facilitate only response speed (Prinzmetal, McCool, & Park, 2005), we tested whether these cues produce reflexive or volitional shifts of attention. A cued letter discrimination task was used with both gaze (Experiments 1A and 1B) and arrow (Experiments 2A and 2B) cues, in which participants responded to the identity of the target letter. In the response time (respond speed) tasks, participants were asked to respond as quickly as possible to the target; in the accuracy (perceptual quality) tasks, participants were asked to respond as accurately as possible. For both cue types, compatible cues were found to facilitate response speed but not perceptual accuracy, indicating that both gaze and arrow cues generate reflexive shifts in attention.
有人提出,两种无信息的中央线索会产生反射性定向:注视和箭头线索。根据自愿注意力转移会提高反应速度和感知准确性,而反射性注意力转移仅会提高反应速度这一标准(Prinzmetal、McCool和Park,2005年),我们测试了这些线索是否会产生反射性或自愿性注意力转移。我们使用了一个线索字母辨别任务,其中既有注视线索(实验1A和1B),也有箭头线索(实验2A和2B),参与者需要对目标字母的身份做出反应。在反应时间(反应速度)任务中,要求参与者尽快对目标做出反应;在准确性(感知质量)任务中,要求参与者尽可能准确地做出反应。对于这两种线索类型,都发现兼容线索会提高反应速度,但不会提高感知准确性,这表明注视和箭头线索都会产生反射性注意力转移。