Suppr超能文献

测试注视线索和箭头线索是否会引起注意力的反射性或自主性转移。

Testing whether gaze cues and arrow cues produce reflexive or volitional shifts of attention.

作者信息

Stevens Sara A, West Greg L, Al-Aidroos Naseem, Weger Ulrich W, Pratt Jay

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1148-53. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1148.

Abstract

It has been suggested that two types of uninformative central cues produce reflexive orienting: gaze and arrow cues. Using the criterion that voluntary shifts of attention facilitate both response speed and perceptual accuracy, whereas reflexive shifts of attention facilitate only response speed (Prinzmetal, McCool, & Park, 2005), we tested whether these cues produce reflexive or volitional shifts of attention. A cued letter discrimination task was used with both gaze (Experiments 1A and 1B) and arrow (Experiments 2A and 2B) cues, in which participants responded to the identity of the target letter. In the response time (respond speed) tasks, participants were asked to respond as quickly as possible to the target; in the accuracy (perceptual quality) tasks, participants were asked to respond as accurately as possible. For both cue types, compatible cues were found to facilitate response speed but not perceptual accuracy, indicating that both gaze and arrow cues generate reflexive shifts in attention.

摘要

有人提出,两种无信息的中央线索会产生反射性定向:注视和箭头线索。根据自愿注意力转移会提高反应速度和感知准确性,而反射性注意力转移仅会提高反应速度这一标准(Prinzmetal、McCool和Park,2005年),我们测试了这些线索是否会产生反射性或自愿性注意力转移。我们使用了一个线索字母辨别任务,其中既有注视线索(实验1A和1B),也有箭头线索(实验2A和2B),参与者需要对目标字母的身份做出反应。在反应时间(反应速度)任务中,要求参与者尽快对目标做出反应;在准确性(感知质量)任务中,要求参与者尽可能准确地做出反应。对于这两种线索类型,都发现兼容线索会提高反应速度,但不会提高感知准确性,这表明注视和箭头线索都会产生反射性注意力转移。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验