• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼睛与手部:感知刺激如何影响运动动作。

Eyes versus hands: How perceived stimuli influence motor actions.

作者信息

Geiger Alexander, Niessen Eva, Bente Gary, Vogeley Kai

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany.

Brain Imaging Lab, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0180780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180780. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0180780
PMID:28746352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5528250/
Abstract

Many studies showed that biological (e.g., gaze-shifts or hand movements) and non-biological stimuli (e.g., arrows or moving points) redirect attention. Biological stimuli seem to be more suitable than non-biological to perform this task. However, the question remains if biological stimuli do have different influences on redirecting attention and if this property is dependent on how we react to those stimuli. In two separate experiments, participants interact either with a biological or a non-biological stimulus (experiment 1), or with two biological stimuli (gaze-shifts, hand movements)(experiment 2) to which they responded with two different actions (saccade, button press), either in a congruent or incongruent manner. Results from experiment 1 suggest that interacting with the biological stimulus lead to faster responses, compared to the non-biological stimulus, independent of the response type. Results from experiment 2 show longer reaction times when the depicted stimulus was not matching the response type (e.g., reacting with hand movements to a moving object or gaze-shift) compared to a matching condition, while especially the gaze-following condition (reacting with a gaze shift to a perceived gaze shift) led to the fastest responses. These results suggest that redirecting attention is not only dependent on the perceived stimulus but also on the way how those stimuli are responded to.

摘要

许多研究表明,生物刺激(如目光转移或手部动作)和非生物刺激(如箭头或移动的点)都会使注意力发生转移。生物刺激似乎比非生物刺激更适合执行这项任务。然而,问题依然存在:生物刺激在注意力转移方面是否有不同的影响,以及这种特性是否取决于我们对这些刺激的反应方式。在两个独立的实验中,参与者分别与生物刺激或非生物刺激进行交互(实验1),或者与两种生物刺激(目光转移、手部动作)进行交互(实验2),并以两种不同的动作(扫视、按键)做出反应,反应方式可以是一致的,也可以是不一致的。实验1的结果表明,与非生物刺激相比,与生物刺激进行交互能带来更快的反应,且与反应类型无关。实验2的结果显示,与匹配条件相比,当所描绘的刺激与反应类型不匹配时(如对手部动作或目光转移的移动物体做出反应),反应时间更长,而尤其是目光追随条件(对感知到的目光转移做出目光转移反应)导致了最快的反应。这些结果表明,注意力的转移不仅取决于所感知到的刺激,还取决于对这些刺激的反应方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b6e/5528250/2e80f96ab731/pone.0180780.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b6e/5528250/cc293acbcbc4/pone.0180780.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b6e/5528250/d50dcd452c39/pone.0180780.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b6e/5528250/2e80f96ab731/pone.0180780.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b6e/5528250/cc293acbcbc4/pone.0180780.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b6e/5528250/d50dcd452c39/pone.0180780.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b6e/5528250/2e80f96ab731/pone.0180780.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Eyes versus hands: How perceived stimuli influence motor actions.眼睛与手部:感知刺激如何影响运动动作。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0180780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180780. eCollection 2017.
2
Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.注意力对注视和头部运动的差异影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;101(1):198-206. doi: 10.1152/jn.90815.2008. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
3
How active gaze informs the hand in sequential pointing movements.在连续指向动作中,主动注视如何引导手部动作。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Nov;175(4):654-66. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0580-x. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
4
Face stimulus eliminates antisaccade-cost: gaze following is a different kind of arrow.面部刺激消除了反扫视成本:注视跟随是一种不同类型的引导。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Apr;236(4):1041-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5198-2. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Properties of human eye-head gaze shifts in an anti-gaze shift task.人类在反注视转移任务中眼头注视转移的特性。
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):538-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.014. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
6
Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly.注视和箭头干扰物对扫视轨迹的影响相似。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2120-40. doi: 10.1080/17470211003718721. Epub 2010 May 17.
7
Head movements modulate visual responsiveness in the absence of gaze shifts.在没有注视转移的情况下,头部运动会调节视觉反应。
Neuroreport. 2008 May 28;19(8):831-4. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282ff0f86.
8
My eyes want to look where your eyes are looking: exploring the tendency to imitate another individual's gaze.我的眼睛想要看向你正在看的地方:探究模仿他人目光的倾向。
Neuroreport. 2002 Dec 3;13(17):2259-64. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200212030-00018.
9
Effects of short-term adaptation of saccadic gaze amplitude on hand-pointing movements.扫视注视幅度的短期适应性对手指动作的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Feb;124(3):351-62. doi: 10.1007/s002210050632.
10
Saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements trigger equivalent gaze-cued orienting effects.扫视和平滑跟踪眼动引发等效的注视线索定向效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Sep;71(9):1860-1872. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1362703. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues.注意力定向于社会生物学线索的发展轨迹。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jun;234(6):1351-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4627-3. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
2
From gaze cueing to dual eye-tracking: novel approaches to investigate the neural correlates of gaze in social interaction.从注视线索到双眼追踪:研究社交互动中注视的神经相关性的新方法。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2516-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
3
Shall we do this together? Social gaze influences action control in a comparison group, but not in individuals with high-functioning autism.
我们一起做这个吗?社会注视会影响对照组的动作控制,但不会影响高功能自闭症个体的动作控制。
Autism. 2012 Mar;16(2):151-62. doi: 10.1177/1362361311409258. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
4
Eyes on me: an fMRI study of the effects of social gaze on action control.关注我:一项 fMRI 研究注视对动作控制的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):393-403. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq067. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
5
Eye contact enhances mimicry of intransitive hand movements.眼神交流增强了对非传递性手部动作的模仿。
Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):7-10. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0279. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
6
Reflexive social attention is mapped according to effector-specific reference systems.反射性社会注意力是根据效应器特异性参照系统进行映射的。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Aug;197(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1900-8. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
7
Neural mechanisms of social attention.社会注意力的神经机制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
8
Testing whether gaze cues and arrow cues produce reflexive or volitional shifts of attention.测试注视线索和箭头线索是否会引起注意力的反射性或自主性转移。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1148-53. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1148.
9
Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task.在直线二等分任务中,方向和数字线索对半侧空间忽视的调节作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
10
Driven from distraction: how infants respond to parents' attempts to elicit and re-direct their attention.从分心状态中被引导出来:婴儿如何回应父母试图引起并重新引导他们注意力的尝试。
Infant Behav Dev. 2008 Jan;31(1):34-50. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Aug 9.