Dipartimento di Psicologia, "Sapienza" Università di Roma, Italy.
Brain Cogn. 2012 Dec;80(3):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
Recent studies have demonstrated that central cues, such as eyes and arrows, reflexively trigger attentional shifts. However, it is not clear whether the attentional mechanisms induced by these two cues are similar or rather differ in some important way. We investigated hemispheric lateralization of the orienting effects induced by the two cue types in a group of 48 healthy participants comparing arrows and eye gaze as central non-predictive cues in a discrimination task, in which a target stimulus was briefly presented in one of two peripheral positions (left or right of fixation). As predicted by neuropsychological data, reflexive orienting to gaze cues was only observed when the target was presented in the left visual field, whereas reflexive orienting to arrow cues occurred for targets presented in both left and right visual fields.
最近的研究表明,中央线索,如眼睛和箭头,会本能地触发注意力转移。然而,目前尚不清楚这两种线索引起的注意力机制是相似的,还是在某些重要方面存在差异。我们在一组 48 名健康参与者中研究了这两种线索类型引起的定向效应的半球侧化,比较了箭头和眼睛注视作为中央非预测线索在辨别任务中的作用,其中目标刺激短暂地出现在两个外围位置(注视点的左侧或右侧)之一。根据神经心理学数据的预测,只有当目标出现在左视野时,才会出现对注视线索的反射性定向,而对箭头线索的反射性定向则发生在目标出现在左视野和右视野时。