Suppr超能文献

麦克风位置对打鼾声音频率分析的影响。

The impact of the microphone position on the frequency analysis of snoring sounds.

作者信息

Herzog Michael, Kühnel Thomas, Bremert Thomas, Herzog Beatrice, Hosemann Werner, Kaftan Holger

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Aug;266(8):1315-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0858-7. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

Abstract

Frequency analysis of snoring sounds has been reported as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between different sources of snoring. Several studies have been published presenting diverging results of the frequency analyses of snoring sounds. Depending on the position of the used microphones, the results of the frequency analysis of snoring sounds vary. The present study investigated the influence of different microphone positions on the outcome of the frequency analysis of snoring sounds. Nocturnal snoring was recorded simultaneously at six positions (air-coupled: 30 cm middle, 100 cm middle, 30 cm lateral to both sides of the patients' head; body contact: neck and parasternal) in five patients. The used microphones had a flat frequency response and a similar frequency range (10/40 Hz-18 kHz). Frequency analysis was performed by fast Fourier transformation and frequency bands as well as peak intensities (Peaks 1-5) were detected. Air-coupled microphones presented a wider frequency range (60 Hz-10 kHz) compared to contact microphones. The contact microphone at cervical position presented a cut off at frequencies above 300 Hz, whereas the contact microphone at parasternal position revealed a cut off above 100 Hz. On an exemplary base, the study demonstrates that frequencies above 1,000 Hz do appear in complex snoring patterns, and it is emphasised that high frequencies are imported for the interpretation of snoring sounds with respect to the identification of the source of snoring. Contact microphones might be used in screening devices, but for a natural analysis of snoring sounds the use of air-coupled microphones is indispensable.

摘要

鼾声的频率分析已被报道作为一种区分不同打鼾源的诊断工具。已有多项研究发表,呈现出鼾声频率分析的不同结果。根据所用麦克风的位置,鼾声频率分析的结果会有所不同。本研究调查了不同麦克风位置对鼾声频率分析结果的影响。在五名患者中,于六个位置同时记录夜间鼾声(空气耦合:患者头部中间30厘米处、100厘米处、头部两侧向外30厘米处;身体接触:颈部和胸骨旁)。所用麦克风具有平坦的频率响应和相似的频率范围(10/40赫兹 - 18千赫)。通过快速傅里叶变换进行频率分析,并检测频段以及峰值强度(峰值1 - 5)。与接触式麦克风相比,空气耦合麦克风呈现出更宽的频率范围(60赫兹 - 10千赫)。颈部位置的接触式麦克风在高于300赫兹的频率处出现截止,而胸骨旁位置的接触式麦克风在高于100赫兹处出现截止。在一个示例基础上,该研究表明高于1000赫兹的频率确实出现在复杂的打鼾模式中,并强调高频对于解读鼾声以确定打鼾源至关重要。接触式麦克风可用于筛查设备,但对于鼾声的自然分析,空气耦合麦克风的使用不可或缺。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验