Suppr超能文献

基于声压级的烦扰评分是否适用于家庭环境中的打鼾评估?

Are annoyance scores based on sound pressure levels suitable for snoring assessment in the home environment?

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2021 Mar;25(1):417-424. doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02108-y. Epub 2020 May 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

An objective statement about the annoyance of snoring can be made with the Psychoacoustic Snore Score (PSS). The PSS was developed based on subjective assessments and is strongly influenced by observed sound pressure levels. Robustness against day-to-day interfering noises is a fundamental requirement for use at home. This study investigated whether or not the PSS is suitable for use in the home environment.

METHODS

Thirty-six interfering noises, which commonly occur at night, were played in the acoustic laboratory in parallel with 5 snoring sounds. The interfering noises were each presented at sound pressure levels ranging from 25 to 55 dB(A), resulting in 3255 distinct recordings. Annoyance was then assessed using the PSS.

RESULTS

In the case of minimally annoying snoring sounds, interfering noises with a sound pressure level of 25 dB(A) caused significant PSS changes from 40 to 55 dB(A) for annoying snoring sounds. If the interfering noise was another snoring sound, the PSS was more robust depending on the sound pressure level of the interfering noise up to 10 dB(A). Steady (no-peak) interfering noises influenced the PSS more strongly than peak noises.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSS is significantly distorted by quiet interfering noises. Its meaningfulness therefore depends strongly on the acoustic environment. It may therefore be assumed that scores dependent on sound pressure level are suitable for measurements when there is minimal ambient noise, as in the sleep laboratory. However, for measurements where noise is incalculable, as in the home environment, interfering noises may distort the results.

摘要

目的

通过心理声学鼾声评分(PSS)可以对打鼾的烦恼程度做出客观的陈述。PSS 是基于主观评估开发的,并且受到观察到的声压级的强烈影响。在家庭环境中使用,对日常干扰噪声的稳健性是一项基本要求。本研究旨在调查 PSS 是否适合在家庭环境中使用。

方法

在声学实验室中同时播放 5 种打鼾声和 36 种常见于夜间的干扰噪声,每种干扰噪声的声压级范围为 25 至 55dB(A),共产生 3255 个不同的录音。然后使用 PSS 评估烦扰程度。

结果

在轻度烦扰的打鼾声音的情况下,声压级为 25dB(A)的干扰噪声会导致烦扰打鼾声音的 PSS 发生显著变化,从 40 至 55dB(A)。如果干扰噪声是另一种打鼾声,则 PSS 更稳健,取决于干扰噪声的声压级,最高可达 10dB(A)。稳态(无峰值)干扰噪声比峰值噪声对 PSS 的影响更大。

结论

安静的干扰噪声会严重扭曲 PSS。因此,其意义强烈依赖于声学环境。因此,可以假设依赖于声压级的评分适用于最小环境噪声的测量,如在睡眠实验室中。然而,对于噪声不可计算的测量,如在家庭环境中,干扰噪声可能会扭曲结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0818/7987700/c5858791dc9d/11325_2020_2108_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验