Herzog Michael, Schieb Eva, Bremert Thomas, Herzog Beatrice, Hosemann Werner, Kaftan Holger, Kühnel Thomas
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 43-45, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Dec;265(12):1553-62. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0700-2. Epub 2008 May 17.
Despite several ways of investigation, such as clinical examination, drug-induced sleep endoscopy and pressure measurement of the upper airway, it is still difficult to locate the site of snoring exactly. Frequency analysis of snoring sounds is described as a promising diagnostic tool. The aim of the study was to examine simulated snoring under conditions awake, record the produced snoring sounds and compare those sounds with nocturnal snoring. A total of 50 snoring male patients were examined clinically by flexible nasal endoscopy and simulated snoring under conditions awake, and the simulated snoring sounds were recorded. Additionally, nocturnal snoring sounds were recorded during nighttime polysomnography. Snoring events were analyzed by fast-fourier-transformation and the intensity peaks 1-5 were evaluated. Rhythmic and non-rhythmic snoring events were distinguished depending on present obstructive apneas. Clinical and polysomnographical data were correlated with the results of the frequency analysis of the snoring sounds. Simulated snoring sounds revealed a low frequency of 200 Hz in intensity peaks 1 and 2 with an increase up to 3,000 Hz in peaks 3-5. Similar frequency patterns were detected in rhythmic nocturnal snoring. Non-rhythmic snoring events revealed frequency patterns between 2,000 and 3,000 Hz in all five intensity peaks. Simulated snoring resembles rhythmic nocturnal snoring with low-frequency intensity peaks, whereas non-rhythmic snoring revealed high frequencies. The examination during simulated snoring and frequency analysis of snoring sounds might contribute in locating the pathogenesis of snoring.
尽管有多种调查方法,如临床检查、药物诱导睡眠内镜检查和上气道压力测量,但仍难以准确确定打鼾的部位。打鼾声音的频率分析被认为是一种有前景的诊断工具。本研究的目的是在清醒状态下检查模拟打鼾,记录产生的打鼾声音,并将这些声音与夜间打鼾进行比较。共有50名打鼾男性患者接受了灵活鼻内镜的临床检查,并在清醒状态下进行了模拟打鼾,同时记录了模拟打鼾声音。此外,在夜间多导睡眠图检查期间记录了夜间打鼾声音。通过快速傅里叶变换分析打鼾事件,并评估强度峰值1 - 5。根据是否存在阻塞性呼吸暂停来区分有节奏和无节奏的打鼾事件。将临床和多导睡眠图数据与打鼾声音频率分析的结果进行关联。模拟打鼾声音在强度峰值1和2处显示出200 Hz的低频,在峰值3 - 5处增加到3000 Hz。在有节奏的夜间打鼾中检测到类似的频率模式。无节奏的打鼾事件在所有五个强度峰值处的频率模式在2000至3000 Hz之间。模拟打鼾类似于具有低频强度峰值的有节奏的夜间打鼾,而无节奏的打鼾则显示出高频。模拟打鼾期间的检查和打鼾声音的频率分析可能有助于确定打鼾的发病机制。