Schmidt Markus
Organisation for International Dialogue and Conflict Management (IDC), Biosafety Working Group, Abt-Karlg. 19/21, 1180, Vienna, Austria,
Syst Synth Biol. 2008 Jun;2(1-2):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11693-008-9018-z. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
One of the main aims of synthetic biology is to make biology easier to engineer. Major efforts in synthetic biology are made to develop a toolbox to design biological systems without having to go through a massive research and technology process. With this "de-skilling" agenda, synthetic biology might finally unleash the full potential of biotechnology and spark a wave of innovation, as more and more people have the necessary skills to engineer biology. But this ultimate domestication of biology could easily lead to unprecedented safety challenges that need to be addressed: more and more people outside the traditional biotechnology community will create self-replicating machines (life) for civil and defence applications, "biohackers" will engineer new life forms at their kitchen table; and illicit substances will be produced synthetically and much cheaper. Such a scenario is a messy and dangerous one, and we need to think about appropriate safety standards now.
合成生物学的主要目标之一是使生物学更易于工程化。合成生物学领域付出了巨大努力来开发一个工具箱,以便能够设计生物系统,而无需经历大规模的研究和技术流程。通过这一“简化技能要求”议程,合成生物学最终可能释放生物技术的全部潜力,并引发一波创新浪潮,因为越来越多的人具备了对生物学进行工程化操作的必要技能。但这种对生物学的最终驯化可能很容易导致前所未有的安全挑战,这些挑战需要得到解决:传统生物技术领域之外越来越多的人将为民事和国防应用创造自我复制机器(生命),“生物黑客”将在自家餐桌上设计新的生命形式;非法物质将被合成生产且成本更低。这样的情景既混乱又危险,我们现在就需要思考适当的安全标准。