Laboratory for Advanced Brain Signal Processing, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan,
Cogn Neurodyn. 2008 Sep;2(3):257-71. doi: 10.1007/s11571-008-9047-z. Epub 2008 Apr 19.
Electroencephalogram (EEG) is often used in the confirmatory test for brain death diagnosis in clinical practice. Because EEG recording and monitoring is relatively safe for the patients in deep coma, it is believed to be valuable for either reducing the risk of brain death diagnosis (while comparing other tests such as the apnea) or preventing mistaken diagnosis. The objective of this paper is to study several statistical methods for quantitative EEG analysis in order to help bedside or ambulatory monitoring or diagnosis. We apply signal processing and quantitative statistical analysis for the EEG recordings of 32 adult patients. For EEG signal processing, independent component analysis (ICA) was applied to separate the independent source components, followed by Fourier and time-frequency analysis. For quantitative EEG analysis, we apply several statistical complexity measures to the EEG signals and evaluate the differences between two groups of patients: the subjects in deep coma, and the subjects who were categorized as brain death. We report statistically significant differences of quantitative statistics with real-life EEG recordings in such a clinical study, and we also present interpretation and discussions on the preliminary experimental results.
脑电图(EEG)在临床实践中常用于脑死亡诊断的确认性测试。由于 EEG 记录和监测对深度昏迷的患者相对安全,因此被认为对于降低脑死亡诊断的风险(与其他测试如窒息相比)或防止误诊具有重要价值。本文的目的是研究几种用于定量 EEG 分析的统计方法,以帮助床边或门诊监测或诊断。我们对 32 名成年患者的 EEG 记录进行了信号处理和定量统计分析。对于 EEG 信号处理,应用独立成分分析(ICA)分离独立的源分量,然后进行傅里叶和时频分析。对于定量 EEG 分析,我们将几种统计复杂度度量应用于 EEG 信号,并评估两组患者之间的差异:深度昏迷的受试者和被归类为脑死亡的受试者。我们报告了在这项临床研究中,基于实际 EEG 记录的定量统计学存在显著差异,并对初步实验结果进行了解释和讨论。