Suppr超能文献

8个月矫正年龄时极早产儿与足月儿执行功能的比较。

A comparison of executive function in very preterm and term infants at 8 months corrected age.

作者信息

Sun Jing, Mohay Heather, O'Callaghan Michael

机构信息

School of Public Health, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, Q4131, Australia.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2009 Apr;85(4):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Executive function (EF) emerges in infancy and continues to develop throughout childhood. Executive dysfunction is believed to contribute to learning and attention problems in children at school age. Children born very preterm are more prone to these problems than their full-term peers.

AIM

To compare EF in very preterm and full-term infants at 8 months after expected date of delivery.

SUBJECTS

37 very preterm infants without identified disabilities, and 74 gender and age matched healthy full-term infants. The very preterm infants were all </=32 weeks gestation and <1250 g birthweight.

OUTCOME MEASURES

EF tasks which measured working memory, inhibition of distraction, and planning at 8 months after expected date of delivery.

RESULTS

The very preterm infants performed significantly more poorly than the full-term infants on all measures of executive function. No significant differences were found between very preterm and full-term infants on any of potentially confounding variables of, infant temperament, maternal education, family income and maternal psychological wellbeing. Very preterm infants had significantly lower scores on the Mental Development Index (MDI) and Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID II), however when this was partialled out the differences in EF scores remained. Medical complications, lower birthweight and lower gestation age were all found to adversely affect the performance of very preterm infants on executive function tasks.

CONCLUSION

Very preterm infants performed more poorly than full-term infants on measures of EF. Further follow up studies are required to investigate whether EF measures in infancy can predict learning and attention outcome at school age.

摘要

背景

执行功能(EF)在婴儿期出现,并在整个儿童期持续发展。执行功能障碍被认为会导致学龄儿童出现学习和注意力问题。极早产出生的儿童比足月儿更容易出现这些问题。

目的

比较预期分娩日期后8个月时极早产婴儿和足月儿的执行功能。

研究对象

37名未发现残疾的极早产婴儿,以及74名性别和年龄匹配的健康足月儿。极早产婴儿的孕周均≤32周,出生体重<1250克。

观察指标

在预期分娩日期后8个月时测量工作记忆、注意力抑制和计划能力的执行功能任务。

结果

在所有执行功能测量指标上,极早产婴儿的表现明显比足月儿差。在婴儿气质、母亲教育程度、家庭收入和母亲心理健康等任何潜在混杂变量方面,极早产婴儿和足月儿之间均未发现显著差异。极早产婴儿在贝利婴儿发育量表(BSID II)的心理发展指数(MDI)和心理运动发展指数(PDI)上得分显著较低,然而在排除这一因素后,执行功能得分的差异仍然存在。医学并发症、较低的出生体重和较低的孕周均被发现对极早产婴儿执行功能任务的表现有不利影响。

结论

在执行功能测量指标上,极早产婴儿的表现比足月儿差。需要进一步的随访研究来调查婴儿期的执行功能测量指标是否能预测学龄期的学习和注意力结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验