Ahern Jennifer, Galea Sandro, Hubbard Alan, Syme S Leonard
Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, 101 Haviland Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Feb 1;100(1-2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
Although neighborhoods with more collective efficacy have better health in general, recent work suggests that social norms and collective efficacy may in combination influence health behaviors such as smoking.
Using data from the New York Social Environment Study (conducted in 2005; n=4000), we examined the separate and combined associations of neighborhood collective efficacy and anti-smoking norms with individual smoking. The outcome was current smoking, assessed using the World Mental Health Comprehensive International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) tobacco module. Exposures of interest were neighborhood collective efficacy, measured as the average neighborhood response on a well-established scale, and neighborhood anti-smoking norms, measured as the proportion of residents who believed regular smoking was unacceptable. All analyses adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, as well as history of smoking prior to residence in the current neighborhood, individual perception of smoking level in the neighborhood, individual perception of collective efficacy, and individual smoking norms.
In separate generalized estimating equation logistic regression models, neighborhood collective efficacy was not associated with smoking (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84-1.34) but permissive neighborhood smoking norms were associated with more smoking (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.03-1.74), particularly among residents with no prior history of smoking (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.92-4.30). When considered in combination, where smoking norms were permissive, higher collective efficacy was associated with more smoking; in contrast, where norms were strongly anti-smoking, higher collective efficacy was associated with less smoking.
Features of the neighborhood social environment may need to be considered in combinations to understand their role in shaping health and health behavior.
尽管总体而言,具有更强集体效能感的社区居民健康状况更佳,但近期研究表明,社会规范与集体效能感可能共同影响吸烟等健康行为。
利用纽约社会环境研究(于2005年开展;n = 4000)的数据,我们考察了社区集体效能感和反吸烟规范分别以及共同与个人吸烟行为之间的关联。研究结果为当前吸烟状况,通过世界心理健康综合国际诊断访谈(WMH - CIDI)烟草模块进行评估。感兴趣的暴露因素包括社区集体效能感,通过一个成熟量表上的社区平均反应来衡量;以及社区反吸烟规范,通过认为经常吸烟不可接受的居民比例来衡量。所有分析均对人口统计学和社会经济特征进行了调整,同时还考虑了在当前社区居住前的吸烟史、个人对社区吸烟水平的认知、个人对集体效能感的认知以及个人吸烟规范。
在单独的广义估计方程逻辑回归模型中,社区集体效能感与吸烟行为无关联(比值比[OR] = 1.06,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.84 - 1.34),但社区宽松的吸烟规范与更多吸烟行为相关(OR = 1.34,95% CI = 1.03 - 1.74),尤其是在无吸烟史的居民中(OR = 2.88,95% CI = 1.92 - 4.30)。综合考虑时,在吸烟规范宽松的情况下,更高的集体效能感与更多吸烟行为相关;相反,在吸烟规范严格反吸烟的情况下,更高的集体效能感与更少吸烟行为相关。
可能需要综合考虑社区社会环境的特征,以理解其在塑造健康和健康行为方面的作用。