Wicker Thomas, Krattinger Simon G, Lagudah Evans S, Komatsuda Takao, Pourkheirandish Mohammad, Matsumoto Takashi, Cloutier Sylvie, Reiser Laurenz, Kanamori Hiroyuki, Sato Kazuhiro, Perovic Dragan, Stein Nils, Keller Beat
Institute of Plant Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan;149(1):258-70. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.129734. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
A large number of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties have evolved in agricultural ecosystems since domestication. Because of the large, repetitive genomes of these Triticeae crops, sequence information is limited and molecular differences between modern varieties are poorly understood. To study intraspecies genomic diversity, we compared large genomic sequences at the Lr34 locus of the wheat varieties Chinese Spring, Renan, and Glenlea, and diploid wheat Aegilops tauschii. Additionally, we compared the barley loci Vrs1 and Rym4 of the varieties Morex, Cebada Capa, and Haruna Nijo. Molecular dating showed that the wheat D genome haplotypes diverged only a few thousand years ago, while some barley and Ae. tauschii haplotypes diverged more than 500,000 years ago. This suggests gene flow from wild barley relatives after domestication, whereas this was rare or absent in the D genome of hexaploid wheat. In some segments, the compared haplotypes were very similar to each other, but for two varieties each at the Rym4 and Lr34 loci, sequence conservation showed a breakpoint that separates a highly conserved from a less conserved segment. We interpret this as recombination breakpoints of two ancient haplotypes, indicating that the Triticeae genomes are a heterogeneous and variable mosaic of haplotype fragments. Analysis of insertions and deletions showed that large events caused by transposable element insertions, illegitimate recombination, or unequal crossing over were relatively rare. Most insertions and deletions were small and caused by template slippage in short homopolymers of only a few base pairs in size. Such frequent polymorphisms could be exploited for future molecular marker development.
自驯化以来,农业生态系统中已培育出大量的小麦(普通小麦)和大麦(大麦)品种。由于这些小麦族作物的基因组庞大且重复,序列信息有限,现代品种之间的分子差异也知之甚少。为了研究种内基因组多样性,我们比较了小麦品种中国春、雷南和格伦利亚以及二倍体小麦节节麦在Lr34位点的大基因组序列。此外,我们还比较了大麦品种Morex、Cebada Capa和春之誉在Vrs1和Rym4位点的序列。分子年代测定表明,小麦D基因组单倍型仅在几千年前分化,而一些大麦和节节麦的单倍型在50多万年前就已分化。这表明驯化后野生大麦亲缘种存在基因流动,而在六倍体小麦的D基因组中这种情况很少见或不存在。在某些片段中,比较的单倍型彼此非常相似,但在Rym4和Lr34位点的两个品种中,序列保守性显示出一个断点,将一个高度保守的片段与一个保守性较低的片段分开。我们将此解释为两个古老单倍型的重组断点,表明小麦族基因组是单倍型片段的异质且可变的镶嵌体。插入和缺失分析表明,由转座元件插入、异常重组或不等交换引起的大事件相对较少。大多数插入和缺失都很小,是由仅几个碱基对大小的短同聚物中的模板滑动引起的。这种频繁的多态性可用于未来分子标记的开发。