Davies Andrew, Cifaldi Mary A, Segurado Oscar G, Weisman Michael H
United BioSource Corporation, London, UK.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):16-26. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080257.
To estimate the comparative lifetime cost-effectiveness of sequenced therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists as the initial therapeutic intervention for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Because patients with RA switch regimens many times throughout the course of disease, sequenced therapeutic interventions were modeled, continuing until the last effective agent failed or death occurred. The model used published clinical outcomes from short-term, randomized controlled trials. Direct treatment costs and costs of lost productivity were modeled for each of 5 alternative treatment sequences. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are expressed as quality-adjusted lifeyears (QALY) gained.
Treatment sequences that included TNF antagonists produced a greater number of QALY than conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drug regimens alone. The cost-effectiveness of sequenced therapy initiated with adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) extendedly dominated both infliximab-plus-MTX-initiated and etanercept sequences. The cost of adalimumab plus MTX per QALY was US $47,157 excluding productivity losses, and $19,663 including productivity losses. A supplementary sequence that incorporated adalimumab-plus-MTX-initiated first-line therapy followed by another TNF antagonist as second-line therapy was modeled; this sequence resulted in additional QALY gained and extendedly dominated all single-TNF strategies.
Of the 3 single-TNF antagonist sequences, the adalimumab-plus-MTX-initiated sequence was cost-effective in producing the greatest number of QALY. Multiple TNF strategies, such as the supplementary sequence modeled in this analysis, may be cost-effective in producing even greater health gain.
评估以肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)拮抗剂作为初始治疗干预手段对早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者进行序贯治疗的终生成本效益比。
由于RA患者在疾病过程中会多次更换治疗方案,因此对序贯治疗干预进行建模,持续至最后一种有效药物失效或患者死亡。该模型使用已发表的短期随机对照试验的临床结果。对5种替代治疗方案中的每一种都进行了直接治疗成本和生产力损失成本的建模。增量成本效益比以获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)表示。
与单独使用传统改善病情抗风湿药物方案相比,包含TNF拮抗剂的治疗方案产生了更多的QALY。以阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)开始的序贯治疗的成本效益比在很大程度上优于以英夫利昔单抗联合MTX开始的治疗方案和依那西普治疗方案。不包括生产力损失时,每获得一个QALY,阿达木单抗联合MTX的成本为47,157美元;包括生产力损失时,成本为19,663美元。对一种补充治疗方案进行了建模,该方案以阿达木单抗联合MTX作为一线治疗,随后使用另一种TNF拮抗剂作为二线治疗;该方案带来了额外的QALY,并在很大程度上优于所有单一TNF治疗策略。
在3种单一TNF拮抗剂治疗方案中,以阿达木单抗联合MTX开始的治疗方案在产生最多QALY方面具有成本效益。多种TNF治疗策略,如本分析中建模的补充治疗方案,在带来更大健康获益方面可能具有成本效益。