Giesen Janneke C A H, Havermans Remco C, Nederkoorn Chantal, Strafaci Silvana, Jansen Anita
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Jan;47(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
This study investigates individual differences in the reinforcing value of snack food. More specifically, it was investigated whether differences in restraint status are associated with differences in working for high-caloric snack food. Thirty-six unrestrained non-dieters, twenty restrained non-dieters and fifteen current dieters performed a concurrent schedules task in which they had the option to work for points for either snack food or fruit and vegetables. By progressively increasing the "price" of the snack foods (i.e., the amount of work required to obtain extra snack points) the relative reinforcing value of snack food was determined. As hypothesized, restrained non-dieters worked harder and current dieters worked less hard to obtain snack food as compared to unrestrained non-dieters.
本研究调查了休闲食品强化价值的个体差异。更具体地说,研究了克制程度的差异是否与为高热量休闲食品而工作的差异相关。三十六名无节制的非节食者、二十名有节制的非节食者和十五名当前节食者进行了一项并发日程任务,在该任务中,他们可以选择为休闲食品或水果和蔬菜赚取积分而工作。通过逐步提高休闲食品的“价格”(即获得额外休闲食品积分所需的工作量),确定了休闲食品的相对强化价值。正如所假设的,与无节制的非节食者相比,有节制的非节食者为获得休闲食品会更加努力工作,而当前节食者则会少些努力。