Westerhof Jessie, Koornstra Jan J, Weersma Rinse K
Current affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.070. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
Analyzing small-bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) images is time consuming.
To determine the effect of reducing the number of images on reading time and interpretation of CE procedures.
Two techniques aimed at reducing the number of images to be viewed were studied. The number of images was reduced by removing every second image (study A) or by the Quickview mode (study B). In both studies, one endoscopist viewed the images in the conventional way, whereas another endoscopist viewed the reduced number of images.
A single-center prospective study.
Two hundred CE procedures, 100 consecutive procedures for each study.
Reading times for small-bowel images were recorded. Kappa (kappa) values were used to calculate interobserver agreement between viewing techniques. Diagnostic miss rates were calculated.
Median procedure reading times were significantly reduced by viewing half the number of images (10.2 minutes) or using the Quickview technique (4.4 minutes) compared with conventional viewing (17.0 minutes). Interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.91) in study A and good (kappa = 0.74) in study B. The diagnostic miss rate was 2% when half the number of images were viewed and 8% when the Quickview technique was used. Agreement between both techniques and conventional viewing was best when the indication for the procedure was suspected inflammatory bowel disease.
Lack of a criterion standard.
Techniques that reduce the number of images examined in CE are time saving but are associated with considerable diagnostic miss rates. Such techniques may only be considered if inflammatory bowel disease is suspected.
分析小肠胶囊内镜(CE)图像耗时。
确定减少图像数量对CE检查阅读时间及解读的影响。
研究了两种旨在减少需查看图像数量的技术。通过每隔一幅图像删除一幅(研究A)或使用快速查看模式(研究B)来减少图像数量。在两项研究中,一名内镜医师以传统方式查看图像,而另一名内镜医师查看数量减少的图像。
单中心前瞻性研究。
200例CE检查,每项研究连续100例检查。
记录小肠图像的阅读时间。使用卡帕(kappa)值计算不同查看技术之间的观察者间一致性。计算诊断漏诊率。
与传统查看(17.0分钟)相比,查看一半数量的图像(10.2分钟)或使用快速查看技术(4.4分钟)时,检查的中位阅读时间显著缩短。研究A中观察者间一致性极佳(kappa = 0.91),研究B中良好(kappa = 0.74)。查看一半数量图像时诊断漏诊率为2%,使用快速查看技术时为8%。当检查指征为疑似炎症性肠病时,两种技术与传统查看之间的一致性最佳。
缺乏标准对照。
减少CE检查中所查看图像数量的技术节省时间,但与相当高的诊断漏诊率相关。仅在疑似炎症性肠病时才可能考虑使用此类技术。