McElrath M Juliana, De Rosa Stephen C, Moodie Zoe, Dubey Sheri, Kierstead Lisa, Janes Holly, Defawe Olivier D, Carter Donald K, Hural John, Akondy Rama, Buchbinder Susan P, Robertson Michael N, Mehrotra Devan V, Self Steven G, Corey Lawrence, Shiver John W, Casimiro Danilo R
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute and the HIV Vaccine Trials Network, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute and the HIV Vaccine Trials Network, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lancet. 2008 Nov 29;372(9653):1894-1905. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61592-5. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
In the Step Study, the MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine did not reduce plasma viraemia after infection, and HIV-1 incidence was higher in vaccine-treated than in placebo-treated men with pre-existing adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) immunity. We assessed vaccine-induced immunity and its potential contributions to infection risk.
To assess immunogenicity, we characterised HIV-specific T cells ex vivo with validated interferon-gamma ELISPOT and intracellular cytokine staining assays, using a case-cohort design. To establish effects of vaccine and pre-existing Ad5 immunity on infection risk, we undertook flow cytometric studies to measure Ad5-specific T cells and circulating activated (Ki-67+/BcL-2(lo)) CD4+ T cells expressing CCR5.
We detected interferon-gamma-secreting HIV-specific T cells (range 163/10(6) to 686/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells) ex vivo by ELISPOT in 77% (258/354) of people receiving vaccine; 218 of 354 (62%) recognised two to three HIV proteins. We identified HIV-specific CD4+ T cells by intracellular cytokine staining in 58 of 142 (41%) people. In those with reactive CD4+ T cells, the median percentage of CD4+ T cells expressing interleukin 2 was 88%, and the median co-expression of interferon gamma or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), or both, was 72%. We noted HIV-specific CD8+ T cells (range 0.4-1.0%) in 117 of 160 (73%) participants, expressing predominantly either interferon gamma alone or with TNFalpha. Vaccine-induced HIV-specific immunity, including response rate, magnitude, and cytokine profile, did not differ between vaccinated male cases (before infection) and non-cases. Ad5-specific T cells were lower in cases than in non-cases in several subgroup analyses. The percentage of circulating Ki-67+BcL-2(lo)/CCR5+CD4+ T cells did not differ between cases and non-cases.
Consistent with previous trials, the MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine was highly immunogenic for inducing HIV-specific CD8+ T cells. Our findings suggest that future candidate vaccines have to elicit responses that either exceed in magnitude or differ in breadth or function from those recorded in this trial.
在STEP研究中,MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef疫苗在感染后并未降低血浆病毒血症,并且在预先存在5型腺病毒(Ad5)免疫力的男性中,疫苗治疗组的HIV-1发病率高于安慰剂治疗组。我们评估了疫苗诱导的免疫及其对感染风险的潜在影响。
为评估免疫原性,我们采用病例队列设计,通过经验证的干扰素-γ ELISPOT和细胞内细胞因子染色试验对HIV特异性T细胞进行体外特征分析。为确定疫苗和预先存在的Ad5免疫力对感染风险的影响,我们进行了流式细胞术研究,以测量Ad5特异性T细胞和表达CCR5的循环活化(Ki-67+/BcL-2(lo))CD4+ T细胞。
通过ELISPOT,我们在77%(258/354)接受疫苗的人群中体外检测到分泌干扰素-γ的HIV特异性T细胞(范围为163/10(6)至686/10(6)外周血单个核细胞);354人中有218人(62%)识别两种至三种HIV蛋白。通过细胞内细胞因子染色,我们在142人中有58人(41%)识别出HIV特异性CD4+ T细胞。在具有反应性CD4+ T细胞的人群中,表达白细胞介素2的CD4+ T细胞的中位数百分比为88%,干扰素-γ或肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)或两者共表达的中位数为72%。我们在160名参与者中的117人(73%)中发现了HIV特异性CD8+ T细胞(范围为0.4 - 1.0%),主要单独表达干扰素-γ或与TNFα共表达。疫苗诱导的HIV特异性免疫,包括反应率、强度和细胞因子谱,在接种疫苗的男性病例(感染前)和非病例之间没有差异。在几个亚组分析中,病例组的Ad5特异性T细胞低于非病例组。病例组和非病例组之间循环Ki-67+BcL-2(lo)/CCR5+CD4+ T细胞的百分比没有差异。
与先前的试验一致,MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef疫苗在诱导HIV特异性CD8+ T细胞方面具有高度免疫原性。我们的研究结果表明,未来的候选疫苗必须引发强度超过或广度或功能与本试验中记录的不同的反应。