Dale Jeremy, Caramlau Isabela, Sturt Jackie, Friede Tim, Walker Rosemary
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.014. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
To test trial design issues related to measuring the effectiveness of a peer telephone intervention to enhance self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes; evaluate the impact on self-efficacy and clinical outcome; and describe patient and peer experience.
Eligible patients had raised HbA1c (initial threshold >8%, reduced to >7.4% mid-way through trial). Patients were recruited from 40 general practices and randomised (40:40:20 ratio) to receive routine care alone or, in addition, motivational telephone support from a peer supporter or a diabetes specialist nurse (9 peers and 12 DSNs) for a period of up to 6 months. The primary outcome measure was self-efficacy score, and secondary outcome measures included HbA1c. Patient and telecare supporter satisfaction and experience were evaluated.
In all, 231 patients participated. At 6 months there were no statistically significant differences in self-efficacy scores (p=0.68), HbA1c (p=0.87) or other secondary outcome measures. There was evidence of a high level of acceptability, but peer telecare support was less highly valued than that from a DSN. Some patients stated that they would have valued more information and advice.
Further consideration needs to be given to the targeting of the telecare peer support, its intensity, the training and ongoing supervision of peer supporters, and the extent to which information and advice should be incorporated.
While some patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes value peer telephone support, this approach appears not to suit all patients. Further intervention development and evaluation is required before widespread adoption can be recommended.
测试与衡量同伴电话干预以提高2型糖尿病自我效能相关的试验设计问题;评估对自我效能和临床结果的影响;并描述患者和同伴的体验。
符合条件的患者糖化血红蛋白水平升高(初始阈值>8%,试验进行到一半时降至>7.4%)。从40家全科诊所招募患者,并按40:40:20的比例随机分组,分别接受单纯常规护理,或额外接受同伴支持者或糖尿病专科护士(9名同伴和12名糖尿病专科护士)长达6个月的激励性电话支持。主要结局指标是自我效能量表得分,次要结局指标包括糖化血红蛋白。评估患者和远程护理支持者的满意度及体验。
共有231名患者参与。6个月时,自我效能量表得分(p=0.68)、糖化血红蛋白(p=0.87)或其他次要结局指标均无统计学显著差异。有证据表明该干预具有较高的可接受性,但同伴远程护理支持的受重视程度低于糖尿病专科护士提供的支持。一些患者表示他们本希望获得更多信息和建议。
需要进一步考虑远程护理同伴支持的目标人群、支持强度、同伴支持者的培训及持续监督,以及应纳入信息和建议的程度。
虽然一些2型糖尿病控制不佳的患者重视同伴电话支持,但这种方法似乎并不适合所有患者。在建议广泛采用之前,需要进一步开展干预措施的开发和评估。