• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量优于数量:卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对反向奖励偶然性的快速学习

Quality before quantity: rapid learning of reverse-reward contingency by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

作者信息

Anderson James R, Hattori Yuko, Fujita Kazuo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):445-8. doi: 10.1037/a0012624.

DOI:10.1037/a0012624
PMID:19014269
Abstract

Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were tested on a reverse-reward task involving different quantities of the same food, or an identical quantity of different foods. All monkeys tested first on the qualitative version spontaneously mastered the task, whereas only one of four spontaneously mastered the quantitative version. No monkey reached criterion when the tasks were switched, although almost all did so following remedial procedures after the study. The results suggest that (a) qualitative reverse-reward is easier than quantitative versions of the problem, (b) quality and quantity dimensions are processed differently in food-related tasks, and (c) capuchin monkeys can show rapid and spontaneous learning of reverse-reward contingencies.

摘要

卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)接受了一项反向奖励任务测试,该任务涉及相同食物的不同数量,或相同数量的不同食物。所有先在定性版本上进行测试的猴子都能自发掌握该任务,而四只猴子中只有一只自发掌握了定量版本。当任务切换时,没有猴子达到标准,不过在研究后的补救程序后,几乎所有猴子都做到了。结果表明:(a)定性反向奖励比该问题的定量版本更容易;(b)在与食物相关的任务中,质量和数量维度的处理方式不同;(c)卷尾猴能够快速自发地学习反向奖励的意外情况。

相似文献

1
Quality before quantity: rapid learning of reverse-reward contingency by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).质量优于数量:卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对反向奖励偶然性的快速学习
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):445-8. doi: 10.1037/a0012624.
2
Learning and generalization of tool use by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in tasks involving three factors: reward, tool, and hindrance.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在涉及奖励、工具和障碍三个因素的任务中对工具使用的学习与泛化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):10-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020274.
3
Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的类比推理
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):167-75. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.167.
4
Capuchins (Cebus apella) can solve a means-end problem.卷尾猴(僧帽猴)能够解决手段-目的问题。
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Aug;124(3):271-7. doi: 10.1037/a0019369.
5
Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)将工具运输到食物地点的行为
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0213-3. Epub 2004 Mar 12.
6
Cooperative problem solving by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): spontaneous division of labor, communication, and reciprocal altruism.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的合作性问题解决:自发分工、沟通与互惠利他行为
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):335-42. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.335.
7
Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others' reward: an experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics.卷尾猴(Cebus apella)对他人的奖励很敏感:对同种选择食物的实验分析。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):249-61. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0262-8. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
8
Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对依次呈现的食物项目的数量判断
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0174-z. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
9
Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在使用工具时对因果关系缺乏理解。
J Comp Psychol. 1994 Mar;108(1):15-22. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.15.
10
Learning from others' mistakes in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)从其他同类的错误中学习。
Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0150-7. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Waiting for the better reward: Comparison of delay of gratification in young children across two cultures.等待更好的回报:两种文化背景下幼儿延迟满足的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 3;16(9):e0256966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256966. eCollection 2021.
2
Better, Not Just More-Contrast in Qualitative Aspects of Reward Facilitates Impulse Control in Pigs.更好,而非仅仅更多——奖励定性方面的差异有助于猪的冲动控制
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 6;9:2099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02099. eCollection 2018.
3
Abstraction promotes creative problem-solving in rhesus monkeys.
抽象化促进恒河猴创造性问题解决能力。
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.黑猩猩能够指向较少数量的食物以积累更多食物,但它们在反向奖励应急任务中仍然失败。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(4):347-358. doi: 10.1037/xan0000115. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
5
Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).工作并等待更好的回报:两种猴类(白领白脸猴和恒河猴)的自我控制
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Transfer of the nonmatch-to-goal rule in monkeys across cognitive domains.猴子跨认知领域的非匹配目标规则转移。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e84100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084100. eCollection 2013.
7
Brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus) can master the qualitative version of the reverse-reward contingency.褐美狐猴(Eulemur fulvus)能够掌握反向奖励关联的定性版本。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048378. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
8
Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) let lesser rewards pass them by to get better rewards.卷尾猴(Cebus apella)会放弃较小的奖励,选择获得更好的奖励。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Sep;15(5):963-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0522-x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
9
Humans and monkeys show similar skill in estimating uncertain outcomes.人类和猴子在估计不确定结果方面表现出相似的技能。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):357-62. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0218-x.
10
Tokens improve capuchin performance in the reverse-reward contingency task.代币提高了卷尾猴在反向奖励任务中的表现。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 22;278(1707):849-54. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1602. Epub 2010 Sep 22.