• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的类比推理

Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).

作者信息

Kennedy Erica Hoy, Fragaszy Dorothy M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):167-75. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.167.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.167
PMID:18489232
Abstract

Previous evidence has suggested that analogical reasoning (recognizing similarities among object relations when the objects themselves are dissimilar) is limited to humans and apes. This study investigated whether capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) can use analogical reasoning to solve a 3-dimensional search task. The task involved hiding a food item under 1 of 2 or 3 plastic cups of different sizes and then allowing subjects to search for food hidden under the cup of analogous size in their own set of cups. Four monkeys were exposed to a series of relational matching tasks. If subjects reached criterion on these tasks, they were exposed to relational transfer tasks involving novel stimuli. Three of the monkeys failed to reach criterion on the basic relational matching tasks and therefore were not tested further. One monkey, however, revealed above-chance performance on a series of transfer tasks with 3 novel stimuli. This evidence suggests that contrary to previous arguments, a member of a New World monkey species can solve an analogical problem.

摘要

先前的证据表明,类比推理(当物体本身不同时识别物体关系之间的相似性)仅限于人类和猿类。本研究调查了卷尾猴(僧帽猴)是否能够使用类比推理来解决三维搜索任务。该任务包括将一个食物项藏在2个或3个不同大小的塑料杯中的其中一个下面,然后让受试者在他们自己的一组杯子中搜索藏在类似大小杯子下面的食物。四只猴子接受了一系列关系匹配任务。如果受试者在这些任务中达到标准,它们将接受涉及新刺激的关系转移任务。其中三只猴子在基本关系匹配任务中未达到标准,因此没有进一步测试。然而,有一只猴子在一系列使用3种新刺激的转移任务中表现出高于随机水平的成绩。这一证据表明,与先前的观点相反,一种新大陆猴可以解决类比问题。

相似文献

1
Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的类比推理
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):167-75. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.167.
2
On the limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).论猕猴(僧帽猴)匹配概念的局限性
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):225-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-225.
3
Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)通过两种感官模式对食物位置的推断
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.
4
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) relational matching: playing by their own (analogical) rules.黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)的关系匹配:按它们自己的(类比)规则行事。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 May;125(2):207-15. doi: 10.1037/a0022098.
5
Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的元记忆
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0217-0. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
6
Learning from others' mistakes in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)从其他同类的错误中学习。
Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0150-7. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
7
Quality before quantity: rapid learning of reverse-reward contingency by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).质量优于数量:卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对反向奖励偶然性的快速学习
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):445-8. doi: 10.1037/a0012624.
8
Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).棕色卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)对数字数量的序数表征。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):79-94. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.79.
9
Discrimination of functionally appropriate and inappropriate throwing tools by captive tufted capuchins (Cebus apella).圈养的簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)对功能合适与不合适投掷工具的辨别
Anim Cogn. 2004 Oct;7(4):255-62. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0220-4. Epub 2004 May 12.
10
A Capuchin monkey (Cebus apella) recognizes when people do and do not know the location of food.卷尾猴(僧帽猴)能够识别人们是否知道食物的位置。
Anim Cogn. 2003 Dec;6(4):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0184-9. Epub 2003 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Relational complexity influences analogical reasoning ability.关系复杂性影响类比推理能力。
iScience. 2023 Mar 11;26(4):106392. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106392. eCollection 2023 Apr 21.
2
How tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and humans (Homo sapiens) handle a jointed tool.丛冠卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)和人类(Homo sapiens)如何使用一种有节的工具。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 Aug;135(3):382-393. doi: 10.1037/com0000282.
3
Can old-world and new-world monkeys judge spatial above/below relations to be the same or different? Some of them, but not all of them.
旧世界猴和新世界猴能判断空间上的上下关系是相同还是不同吗?有些能,但不是全部。
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
4
Does presentation format influence visual size discrimination in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.)?呈现形式会影响簇绒卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)的视觉大小辨别吗?
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0126001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126001. eCollection 2015.
5
Endpoint distinctiveness facilitates analogical mapping in pigeons.端点独特性有助于鸽子进行类比映射。
Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
6
Metaphorical motion in mathematical reasoning: further evidence for pre-motor implementation of structure mapping in abstract domains.数学推理中的隐喻性运动:抽象领域中结构映射的运动前实现的进一步证据。
Cogn Process. 2013 Aug;14(3):217-29. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0555-3. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
7
Monkeys perform as well as apes and humans in a size discrimination task.猴子在大小辨别任务中的表现与猿类和人类相当。
Anim Cogn. 2013 Sep;16(5):829-38. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0616-0. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
8
Analogical reasoning in baboons (Papio papio): flexible reencoding of the source relation depending on the target relation.狒狒(豚尾狒狒)的类比推理:根据目标关系对源关系进行灵活的重新编码。
Learn Behav. 2013 Sep;41(3):229-37. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0101-7.
9
Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.内隐和外显分类:四种物种的故事。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov;36(10):2355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
10
Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(Cebus apella)的连续反应和计划。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Nov;15(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0532-8. Epub 2012 Jul 17.