• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在使用工具时对因果关系缺乏理解。

Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

作者信息

Visalberghi E, Limongelli L

机构信息

Istituto di Psicologia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 1994 Mar;108(1):15-22. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.15.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.15
PMID:8174341
Abstract

Four tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), successful in a tool task in which they used a stick to push a reward out of a tube, were tested in a similar task, with a tube with a hole and a small trap. Depending on where the stick was inserted, the reward was pushed either out of the tube or into the trap. With the trap-tube task, we assessed whether the monkeys understood the cause-effect relation between their behavior and the outcome. In Experiment 1, each subject underwent 14 10-trial blocks with the trap tube. Three subjects performed at chance level. The 4th subject's (Rb) performance improved, reaching 95% success in the last 6 blocks. In Experiment 2, Rb received additional tests to investigate its successful strategy further. Rb solved the trap-tube task by means of a distance-based, associative rule. The performances of the 4 subjects indicate that they did not take into account the effects of their actions on the reward.

摘要

四只簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在一项工具任务中成功地用棍子将奖励从管子中推出,它们在一项类似的任务中接受了测试,该任务使用的管子有一个洞和一个小陷阱。根据棍子插入的位置,奖励要么被推出管子,要么掉进陷阱。通过陷阱管任务,我们评估猴子是否理解它们的行为与结果之间的因果关系。在实验1中,每个受试者对陷阱管进行了14个包含10次试验的组块。三只受试者的表现处于随机水平。第四只受试者(Rb)的表现有所提高,在最后6个组块中成功率达到了95%。在实验2中,Rb接受了额外的测试,以进一步研究其成功策略。Rb通过基于距离的关联规则解决了陷阱管任务。这4只受试者的表现表明,它们没有考虑到自己的行为对奖励的影响。

相似文献

1
Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在使用工具时对因果关系缺乏理解。
J Comp Psychol. 1994 Mar;108(1):15-22. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.15.
2
How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use?簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)如何理解工具使用中涉及的因果关系?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jul;29(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.233.
3
Learning and generalization of tool use by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in tasks involving three factors: reward, tool, and hindrance.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在涉及奖励、工具和障碍三个因素的任务中对工具使用的学习与泛化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):10-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020274.
4
Performance in a tool-using task by common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).普通黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)、倭黑猩猩(倭黑猩猩属)、一只猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)和卷尾猴(卷尾猴属)在一项使用工具任务中的表现。
J Comp Psychol. 1995 Mar;109(1):52-60. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.109.1.52.
5
Comprehension of cause-effect relations in a tool-using task by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在工具使用任务中对因果关系的理解。
J Comp Psychol. 1995 Mar;109(1):18-26. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.109.1.18.
6
Capuchins (Cebus apella) can solve a means-end problem.卷尾猴(僧帽猴)能够解决手段-目的问题。
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Aug;124(3):271-7. doi: 10.1037/a0019369.
7
Cooperative problem solving by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): spontaneous division of labor, communication, and reciprocal altruism.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的合作性问题解决:自发分工、沟通与互惠利他行为
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):335-42. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.335.
8
Quality before quantity: rapid learning of reverse-reward contingency by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).质量优于数量:卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对反向奖励偶然性的快速学习
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):445-8. doi: 10.1037/a0012624.
9
Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)将工具运输到食物地点的行为
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0213-3. Epub 2004 Mar 12.
10
Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)通过两种感官模式对食物位置的推断
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.

引用本文的文献

1
Fairly flexible: brown-tufted capuchins and a squirrel monkey adjust their motor responses in a foraging task.相当灵活:棕色簇毛卷尾猴和松鼠猴在觅食任务中调整它们的运动反应。
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 12;13:e19023. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19023. eCollection 2025.
2
Evidence of object permanence, short-term spatial memory, causality, understanding of object properties and gravity across five different ungulate species.跨五个不同有蹄类物种的客体永久性、短期空间记忆、因果关系、物体属性和重力理解的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64396-8.
3
Brain intrinsic connection patterns underlying tool processing in human adults are present in neonates and not in macaques.
人类成年人中与工具处理相关的大脑固有连接模式存在于新生儿中,而不存在于猕猴中。
Neuroimage. 2022 Sep;258:119339. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119339. Epub 2022 May 29.
4
The parietal lobe evolution and the emergence of material culture in the human genus.顶叶的进化和人类物质文化的出现。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Jan;228(1):145-167. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02487-w. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
5
What happened? Do preschool children and capuchin monkeys spontaneously use visual traces to locate a reward?发生了什么?学龄前儿童和卷尾猴会自发地利用视觉痕迹来定位奖励吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Aug 11;288(1956):20211101. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1101. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Innovative problem solving in macaws.金刚鹦鹉的创新问题解决能力。
Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):106-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00449-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
7
Exploring the role of individual learning in animal tool-use.探索个体学习在动物工具使用中的作用。
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 25;8:e9877. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9877. eCollection 2020.
8
Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects.非人类动物认知测试的有效性:陷阱与前景
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;11:1835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01835. eCollection 2020.
9
Trialling Meta-Research in Comparative Cognition: Claims and Statistical Inference in Animal Physical Cognition.比较认知中的元研究试验:动物物理认知中的主张与统计推断
Anim Behav Cogn. 2020 Aug;7(3):419-444. doi: 10.26451/abc.07.03.09.2020.
10
Shells as 'extended architecture': to escape isolation, social hermit crabs choose shells with the right external architecture.贝壳作为“延伸的建筑”:为了逃避孤立,寄居蟹选择具有合适外部结构的贝壳。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Nov;23(6):1177-1187. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01419-7. Epub 2020 Aug 8.