Brilliant G E, Lepkowski J M, Zurita B, Thulasiraj R D
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Apr;109(4):584-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080040152048.
A field trial was conducted to compare the effects of eight health education and economic incentive interventions on the awareness and acceptance of cataract surgery. Cataract screening and follow-up surgery were offered to more than 19,000 residents age 40 years and older in a probability sample of 90 villages in south India. Eight months after intervention, an evaluation was conducted to identify those in need of surgery who had been operated on. Two principal measures of program effectiveness are examined: awareness of cataract surgery and acceptance of the surgery. The type of intervention had a negligible effect on awareness of cataract surgery. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that individuals who were aware of surgery tended to be male, literate, and more affluent than those who were unaware of that option. Interventions that covered the complete costs of surgery had higher surgery acceptance rates. One health education strategy, house-to-house visits by a subject with aphakia, increased acceptance of the procedure more than others. In a multiple logistic regression analysis of acceptance rates, persons accepting surgery tended to be male; other factors were not important in explaining variation in acceptance rates.
开展了一项现场试验,以比较八种健康教育和经济激励干预措施对白内障手术知晓率和接受率的影响。在印度南部90个村庄的概率样本中,为19000多名40岁及以上的居民提供了白内障筛查和后续手术。干预八个月后,进行了一项评估,以确定那些需要手术且已接受手术的人。研究考察了项目有效性的两个主要指标:白内障手术知晓率和手术接受率。干预类型对白内障手术知晓率的影响可忽略不计。多元逻辑回归分析显示,知晓手术的个体往往比不知晓的个体更可能为男性、识字且更富裕。涵盖手术全部费用的干预措施具有更高的手术接受率。一种健康教育策略,即由无晶状体患者逐户家访,比其他策略更能提高手术接受率。在接受率的多元逻辑回归分析中,接受手术的人往往为男性;其他因素在解释接受率的差异方面并不重要。