Ismail Khalida, Thomas Stephen M, Maissi Esther, Chalder Trudie, Schmidt Ulrike, Bartlett Jonathan, Patel Anita, Dickens Christopher M, Creed Francis, Treasure Janet
Instituteof Psychiatry, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 18;149(10):708-19. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00005.
Although psychological issues can interfere with diabetes care, the effectiveness of psychological treatments in improving diabetes outcomes is uncertain.
To determine whether motivational enhancement therapy with or without cognitive behavior therapy improves glycemic control in type 1 diabetes compared with usual care.
Randomized, controlled trial.
8 diabetes centers in London and Manchester, United Kingdom.
344 adults with type 1 diabetes for longer than 2 years, with hemoglobin A(1c) levels of 8.2% to 15%, and without complications or severe comorbid disease.
Nurse-delivered motivational enhancement therapy (4 sessions over 2 months), motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy (12 sessions over 6 months), or usual care.
12-month change in hemoglobin A(1c) levels (primary outcome), hypoglycemic events, depression, quality of life, fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes self-care activities, and body mass index (secondary outcomes).
In an analysis including all randomly assigned patients, the 12-month change in hemoglobin A(1c) levels compared with usual care was -0.46% (95% CI, -0.81% to -0.11%) in the motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy group and -0.19% (CI, -0.53% to 0.16%) in the motivational enhancement therapy group alone. There was no evidence of treatment effects on secondary outcomes.
Of 1659 screened patients, only 507 were eligible and 344 participated. Data on the primary outcome were unavailable for 11.3% of the participants. Study design did not permit distinction of the additive effect of cognitive behavior therapy plus motivational enhancement therapy from the effect of greater intensity and duration of the combined intervention compared with the motivational enhancement therapy alone.
Nurse-delivered motivational enhancement therapy and cognitive behavior therapy is feasible for adults with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Combined therapy results in modest 12-month improvement in hemoglobin A(1c) levels compared with usual care, but motivational enhancement therapy alone does not.
尽管心理问题会干扰糖尿病护理,但心理治疗对改善糖尿病预后的有效性尚不确定。
确定与常规护理相比,联合或不联合认知行为疗法的动机增强疗法是否能改善1型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
随机对照试验。
英国伦敦和曼彻斯特的8个糖尿病中心。
344名1型糖尿病成年患者,病程超过2年,糖化血红蛋白水平为8.2%至15%,无并发症或严重合并症。
由护士提供的动机增强疗法(2个月内进行4次治疗)、动机增强疗法加认知行为疗法(6个月内进行12次治疗)或常规护理。
糖化血红蛋白水平的12个月变化(主要结局)、低血糖事件、抑郁、生活质量、低血糖恐惧、糖尿病自我护理活动及体重指数(次要结局)。
在一项纳入所有随机分组患者的分析中,与常规护理相比,动机增强疗法加认知行为疗法组糖化血红蛋白水平的12个月变化为-0.46%(95%CI,-0.81%至-0.11%),单独的动机增强疗法组为-0.19%(CI,-0.53%至0.16%)。没有证据表明治疗对次要结局有影响。
在1659名筛查患者中,只有507名符合条件,344名参与研究。11.3%的参与者没有主要结局的数据。研究设计无法区分认知行为疗法加动机增强疗法的叠加效应与联合干预比单独的动机增强疗法强度和持续时间更长所产生的效果。
对于1型糖尿病控制不佳的成年患者,由护士提供的动机增强疗法和认知行为疗法是可行的。与常规护理相比,联合疗法使糖化血红蛋白水平在12个月时有适度改善,但单独的动机增强疗法则不然。