Pringsheim Tamara, Lang Anthony, Kurlan Roger, Pearce Michelle, Sandor Paul
Tourette Syndrome Neurodevelopmental Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Jun;51(6):468-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03168.x. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
The aim of this study was to understand how children with Tourette syndrome (TS), with or without attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), experience disability. Children seen at two TS centres were eligible for participation. Clinicians compiled baseline information and symptom severity rating scales. Parents completed the Child Health Questionnaire, a measure of physical and psychosocial health. Seventy-one children (56 males, 15 females); mean age 11y 2mo [SD 3y 1mo], range 7-17y) were analyzed in the subgroups: TS only (n=20), TS+ADHD (n=22), TS+ADHD+OCD (n=18), and TS+OCD (n=11). Almost all psychosocial domain scores were significantly lower than national norms for the TS+ADHD and TS+ADHD+OCD subgroups (p<0.001). For the TS only subgroup, only the family activities domain was significantly affected. Psychosocial summary scores were 53.2 for norms, 54.4 for the TS only subgroup (ns), 41.4 for the TS+ADHD subgroup (p<0.001), 35.3 for the TS+ADHD+OCD subgroup (p<0.001), and 35.5 for the TS+OCD group (p=0.003). A multiple linear regression model including diagnosis, age, sex, and TS, OCD, and ADHD symptom severity found that the most significant predictor of the psychosocial summary score was ADHD symptom severity (R(2)=0.55, p<0.001). Children with TS+ADHD+/-OCD experience impairment in all aspects of psychosocial health. For children with TS only, psychosocial health was not different from that of the normative population in the majority of domains tested. This suggests treatment of ADHD and OCD should be the priority in children with multiple diagnoses.
本研究的目的是了解患有抽动秽语综合征(TS)的儿童,无论是否伴有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和/或强迫症(OCD),是如何体验残疾的。在两个抽动秽语综合征中心就诊的儿童符合参与条件。临床医生收集了基线信息和症状严重程度评定量表。家长完成了儿童健康问卷,这是一项衡量身体和心理社会健康的指标。对71名儿童(56名男性,15名女性;平均年龄11岁2个月[标准差3岁1个月],年龄范围7 - 17岁)进行了亚组分析:单纯抽动秽语综合征组(n = 20)、抽动秽语综合征 + 注意力缺陷多动障碍组(n = 22)、抽动秽语综合征 + 注意力缺陷多动障碍 + 强迫症组(n = 18)以及抽动秽语综合征 + 强迫症组(n = 11)。几乎所有心理社会领域得分在抽动秽语综合征 + 注意力缺陷多动障碍组和抽动秽语综合征 + 注意力缺陷多动障碍 + 强迫症亚组中均显著低于全国常模(p < 0.001)。对于单纯抽动秽语综合征亚组,仅家庭活动领域受到显著影响。心理社会总结得分,全国常模为53.2,单纯抽动秽语综合征亚组为54.4(无显著差异),抽动秽语综合征 + 注意力缺陷多动障碍亚组为41.4(p < 0.001),抽动秽语综合征 + 注意力缺陷多动障碍 + 强迫症亚组为35.3(p < 0.001),抽动秽语综合征 + 强迫症组为35.5(p = 0.003)。一个包含诊断、年龄、性别以及抽动秽语综合征、强迫症和注意力缺陷多动障碍症状严重程度的多元线性回归模型发现,心理社会总结得分的最显著预测因素是注意力缺陷多动障碍症状严重程度(R² = 0.55,p < 0.001)。患有抽动秽语综合征 + 注意力缺陷多动障碍 ± 强迫症的儿童在心理社会健康的各个方面都存在损害。对于单纯患有抽动秽语综合征的儿童,在大多数测试领域中,其心理社会健康与正常人群无异。这表明对于多重诊断的儿童,治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍和强迫症应作为优先事项。