Suppr超能文献

帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计测量的眼压和眼脉搏振幅值质量评分的比较。

Comparison of the quality score of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude values measured by the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer.

作者信息

Pourjavan S, Boghossian P, Detry-Morel M

机构信息

St Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;30(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s10792-008-9280-9. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

Abstract

The Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) is designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) largely independent of the corneal properties. It is equipped with a digital LCD screen that displays the IOP, the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and the quality score (Q) of the measurements [range 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor)]. The manufacturer has recommended discarding the IOP and OPA values of Q4 and Q5. The aim of our study was to assess if IOP and OPA measurements with Q3 are acceptable for clinical and research purposes. This is a prospective, observational study in which both patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma and healthy subjects were enrolled; three consecutive PDCT IOP measurements were performed on all participants. Only patients and subjects with Q1, Q2 and Q3 recorded together were eligible. Only one eye per subject was considered for statistical analysis. The mean PDCT IOP and OPA were taken for statistical analyses. An ANOVA test for repeated measures was used to compare the differences between PDCT IOP and OPA Q1, Q2, and Q3 scores. A total of 87 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Mean PDCT (+/-SD) IOP were 17.5 +/- 3.4 mmHg for Q1, 17.6 +/- 3.3 mmHg for Q2 and 17.9 +/- 3.3 mmHg for Q3 (P > 0.05). Mean OPA Q1, Q2 and Q3 were 2.5 +/- 0.9, 2.5 +/- 1.0 and 2.5 +/- 1.0 mmHg, respectively, and were not statistically different. Based on these results, we concluded that the IOP and OPA values with Q1, Q2 or Q3 measured by PDCT are not significantly different and can therefore be taken into account indiscriminately for clinical and research purposes.

摘要

帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计(PDCT)旨在测量眼压(IOP),很大程度上不受角膜特性的影响。它配备了一个数字液晶显示屏,可显示眼压、眼脉搏振幅(OPA)以及测量的质量评分(Q)[范围为1(优秀)至5(差)]。制造商建议舍弃质量评分为4和5时的眼压和OPA值。我们研究的目的是评估质量评分为3时的眼压和OPA测量值在临床和研究目的方面是否可以接受。这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了高眼压或青光眼患者以及健康受试者;对所有参与者进行了连续三次PDCT眼压测量。只有质量评分为1、2和3的患者和受试者被纳入。统计分析仅考虑每个受试者的一只眼睛。采用平均PDCT眼压和OPA进行统计分析。使用重复测量的方差分析来比较PDCT眼压和OPA质量评分1、2和3之间的差异。共有87名受试者符合纳入标准。质量评分为1时,平均PDCT(±标准差)眼压为17.5±3.4 mmHg,质量评分为2时为17.6±3.3 mmHg,质量评分为3时为17.9±3.3 mmHg(P>0.05)。质量评分1、2和3时的平均OPA分别为2.5±0.9、2.5±1.0和2.5±1.0 mmHg,无统计学差异。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,PDCT测量的质量评分为1、2或3时的眼压和OPA值无显著差异,因此在临床和研究目的中可无差别地予以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验