Imagawa A, Fujiki S, Kawahara Y, Matsushita H, Ota S, Tomoda T, Morito Y, Sakakihara I, Fujimoto T, Taira A, Tsugeno H, Kawano S, Yagi S, Takenaka R
Tsuyama Central Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama, Japan.
Endoscopy. 2008 Nov;40(11):905-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077641.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is one of the most complex and lengthy endoscopic procedures, so deep sedation during ESD is indispensable. Our study aims were to determine whether bispectral index (BIS) monitoring is useful in titrating and reducing the dose of the sedative propofol during ESD, and to measure the satisfaction of patients and endoscopists involved in this complex and lengthy endoscopic therapy.
We performed a prospective, randomized clinical trial from July 2006 to February 2008. A total of 156 patients, with gastric neoplasm to be treated using ESD, were randomized to two groups. The BIS group (n = 78) was monitored for propofol sedation using BIS, and the no-BIS group (n = 78) was monitored by standard methods only. The two groups were compared by evaluating the doses of propofol administered to patients and the satisfaction scores (scale of 0 - 10) of patients and endoscopists.
Although there were no significant differences between the two groups in the mean dose of propofol used (BIS group vs. no-BIS group, 5.32 mg/kg/hour vs. 4.85 mg/kg/hour; P = 0.10), the satisfaction scores of the patients (9.15 vs. 7.94; P < 0.01) and endoscopists (8.53 vs. 6.42; P < 0.001) were significantly higher with BIS monitoring.
Monitoring with BIS during the ESD procedure did not lead to a reduction in the dose of propofol required, but did lead to higher satisfaction scores from the patients and endoscopists. A complicated and prolonged endoscopic treatment such as ESD can be carried out with optimal safety, control, and comfort by using BIS to monitor propofol sedation.
内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是最复杂且耗时最长的内镜操作之一,因此ESD期间的深度镇静必不可少。我们的研究目的是确定脑电双频指数(BIS)监测在ESD期间滴定和减少镇静剂丙泊酚剂量方面是否有用,并衡量参与这种复杂且耗时的内镜治疗的患者和内镜医师的满意度。
我们在2006年7月至2008年2月期间进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验。共有156例拟采用ESD治疗胃肿瘤的患者被随机分为两组。BIS组(n = 78)使用BIS监测丙泊酚镇静,无BIS组(n = 78)仅采用标准方法监测。通过评估给予患者的丙泊酚剂量以及患者和内镜医师的满意度评分(0 - 10分)对两组进行比较。
尽管两组在丙泊酚平均使用剂量上无显著差异(BIS组与无BIS组,5.32 mg/kg/小时对4.85 mg/kg/小时;P = 0.10),但采用BIS监测时患者(9.15对7.94;P < 0.01)和内镜医师(8.53对6.42;P < 0.001)的满意度评分显著更高。
ESD操作期间使用BIS监测并未导致所需丙泊酚剂量减少,但确实使患者和内镜医师的满意度评分更高。通过使用BIS监测丙泊酚镇静,诸如ESD这样复杂且耗时的内镜治疗可在最佳的安全性、可控性和舒适度下进行。