Suppr超能文献

黑人和白人中高臂脉压的心血管危险因素比较(查尔斯顿心脏研究、埃文斯县研究、美国国家健康和营养检查调查I和II)

Comparison of cardiovascular risk factors for high brachial pulse pressure in blacks versus whites (Charleston Heart Study, Evans County Study, NHANES I and II Studies).

作者信息

Gazes Peter C, Lackland Daniel T, Mountford William K, Gilbert Gregory E, Harley Russell A

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and the Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Dec 1;102(11):1514-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.042. Epub 2008 Sep 12.

Abstract

We examined whether the risk factors for increased brachial pulse pressure (PP) are similar for blacks and whites. Many studies have reported the strong association of increased brachial PP and the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. Participants were from 4 major epidemiologic studies in the United States (26,083 subjects): Charleston Heart Study, Evans County Heart Study, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I study, and the NHANES II study. At baseline, there was no history or clinical evidence of coronary heart disease (CHD). The CHD mortality as a function of brachial PP and the association of traditional risk factors for CHD with PP were analyzed for each of the 4 studies and for the 4 studies combined. Multiple regression analysis showed that the most significant predictors of high brachial PP are body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2) (regression coefficient 3.79, p <0.0001), diabetes mellitus (5.14, p <0.0001), serum total cholesterol > or =240 mg/dl (0.51, p <0.0157), age (0.60, p <0.0001), gender (-1.77, p <0.0001), and race (3.75, p <0.0001). In conclusion, the same risk factors for CHD (namely, increase in body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2), diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and age) are significantly associated with high brachial PP for blacks and whites. These risk factors were stronger in whites compared with blacks. However, female gender and age variables were even more associated with brachial PP in blacks. Smoking was significant but not reflected in peripheral brachial PP as it is in aortic PP.

摘要

我们研究了黑人与白人中肱动脉脉压(PP)升高的危险因素是否相似。许多研究报告了肱动脉PP升高与心血管疾病患病率之间的密切关联。参与者来自美国4项主要的流行病学研究(26083名受试者):查尔斯顿心脏研究、埃文斯县心脏研究、国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)I研究以及NHANES II研究。基线时,无冠心病(CHD)病史或临床证据。对这4项研究中的每一项以及4项研究合并后的情况,分析了CHD死亡率作为肱动脉PP的函数以及CHD传统危险因素与PP的关联。多元回归分析表明,肱动脉PP升高的最显著预测因素为体重指数≥30 kg/m²(回归系数3.79,p<0.0001)、糖尿病(5.14,p<0.0001)、血清总胆固醇≥240 mg/dl(0.51,p<0.0157)、年龄(0.60,p<0.0001)、性别(-1.77,p<0.0001)以及种族(3.75,p<0.0001)。总之,CHD的相同危险因素(即体重指数≥30 kg/m²升高、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和年龄)与黑人和白人的高肱动脉PP显著相关。与黑人相比,这些危险因素在白人中更强。然而,女性性别和年龄变量与黑人的肱动脉PP关联更为密切。吸烟具有显著意义,但不像在主动脉PP中那样反映在周围肱动脉PP中。

相似文献

2
The gender gap in coronary heart disease mortality: is there a difference between blacks and whites?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Mar;14(2):117-27. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.117.
5
Prediction of coronary heart disease mortality in blacks and whites: pooled data from two national cohorts.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jul 1;84(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00187-3.
7
Pulse pressure and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.
Am J Hypertens. 2013 May;26(5):636-42. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hps092. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
8
Race-Ethnic Disparities in Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles among Stroke Survivors with Undiagnosed Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Dec;26(12):2727-2733. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
9
Heat Maps of Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, and Smoking in the Continental United States.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003350.
10
Pulse pressure amplification a mechanical biomarker of cardiovascular risk.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 9;55(10):1032-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.061.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting Multivariable Risks: An Opportunity for Population High Blood Pressure Control.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 21;4(9):e002517. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002517.
3
Racial differences in hypertension: implications for high blood pressure management.
Am J Med Sci. 2014 Aug;348(2):135-8. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000308.
4
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28-e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
5
Factors influencing the decline in stroke mortality: a statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):315-53. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000437068.30550.cf. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
6
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Associations of cigarette smoking with rheumatoid arthritis in African Americans.
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Dec;62(12):3560-8. doi: 10.1002/art.27716.

本文引用的文献

1
Do statins reduce blood pressure?: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
Hypertension. 2007 Apr;49(4):792-8. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000259737.43916.42. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
2
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications.
Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(21):2588-605. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
3
Differential pulse pressure response to various antihypertensive drug families.
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Oct;20(10):765-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002069. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
6
Effect of smoking on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure amplification.
Hypertension. 2003 Jan;41(1):183-7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000047464.66901.60.
7
Intensive cholesterol reduction lowers blood pressure and large artery stiffness in isolated systolic hypertension.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Mar 20;39(6):1020-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01717-5.
8
Pulse pressure--a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 15;37(4):975-84. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01108-1.
10
How generalizable are coronary risk prediction models? Comparison of Framingham and two national cohorts.
Am Heart J. 1999 May;137(5):837-45. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70407-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验