London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct;24(7):1093-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
This study investigated the change in joint line position after posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with AMK (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) and Genesis II (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tenn) components. A total of 200 primary total knee arthroplasty patients were randomly selected so as to have 50 patients with each of the 4 prosthesis types. Joint line position was measured on preoperative and 2 year postoperative radiographs by both a lateral and an anteroposterior measurement method. Two-year follow-up functional data were assessed. There were no statistically significant differences in the joint line elevation between posterior-stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining designs within the same implant system as measured on lateral radiographs. There were no differences in clinical functional outcomes in patients with variable joint line elevation.
本研究调查了使用 AMK(DePuy,印第安纳州华沙)和 Genesis II(Smith & Nephew,田纳西州孟菲斯)组件的后交叉韧带保留型和后稳定型全膝关节置换术后关节线位置的变化。总共随机选择了 200 例原发性全膝关节置换术患者,以使每种假体类型有 50 例患者。术前和术后 2 年的 X 线片通过侧位和前后位测量方法测量关节线位置。评估了 2 年的随访功能数据。在同一植入物系统中,后稳定型和后交叉韧带保留型设计之间,在侧位 X 线片上测量的关节线抬高没有统计学差异。关节线抬高程度不同的患者在临床功能结果方面没有差异。