Suppr超能文献

采用机器人辅助手术技术在初次全膝关节置换中改善关节线和后髁偏心距的恢复:国际多中心配对队列回顾性分析。

Improved joint line and posterior offset restoration in primary total knee replacement using a robotic-assisted surgical technique: An international multi-centre retrospective analysis of matched cohorts.

机构信息

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 25;17(8):e0272722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272722. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate restoration of joint line height and posterior offset in primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to be important factors in post-operative range of movement and function. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of joint line and posterior offset restoration in a group of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA (raTKA). A matched cohort of patients that underwent a TKA using a conventional jig-based technique was assessed for comparison. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between groups.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 120 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis that received a TKA using the Navio Surgical System (n = 60), or Conventional manual TKA (n = 60). Procedures were performed between 1 January 2019 and 1 October 2019 at six different centres. Joint line height and posterior offset was measured pre-operatively and post-operatively on calibrated weight bearing plain radiographs of the knee. Two observers performed measurements using validated measuring tools. A BMI and age-matched cohort of patients that underwent TKA using a conventional technique in the same six centres were assessed for comparison. Mean values, standard deviations and confidence intervals are presented for change and absolute change in joint line height and posterior offset. Student's t-test was used to compare the changes between techniques.

RESULTS

Patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA had joint line height and posterior offset restored more accurately than patients undergoing TKA using a conventional technique. Average change from pre-operative measurement in joint line height using raTKA was -0.38mm [95% CI: -0.79 to 0.03] vs 0.91 [0.14 to 1.68] with the conventional technique. Average absolute change in joint line height using raTKA was 1.96mm [1.74 to 2.18] vs 4.00mm [3.68 to 4.32] with the conventional technique. Average change in posterior offset using raTKA was 0.08mm [-0.40 to 0.56] vs 1.64mm [2.47 to 0.81] with the conventional technique. Average absolute change in posterior offset with raTKA was 2.19mm [1.92 to 2.46] vs 4.24mm [3.79 to 4.69] with the conventional technique. There was a significant difference when comparing absolute change in joint line height and posterior offset between groups (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted primary TKA restores the joint line height and posterior offset more accurately than conventional jig-based techniques.

摘要

背景

在初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,准确恢复关节线高度和后偏移量已被证明是影响术后活动范围和功能的重要因素。本研究旨在评估在一组接受机器人辅助 TKA(raTKA)的患者中,关节线和后偏移量的恢复准确性。并对使用传统基于夹具技术的 TKA 患者进行了匹配队列评估。零假设是两组之间没有差异。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 120 例患有终末期膝关节骨关节炎的患者,这些患者接受了 Navio 手术系统(n = 60)或传统手动 TKA(n = 60)治疗。这些手术于 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日在六个不同的中心进行。在有校准负重膝关节正位片上,术前和术后分别测量关节线高度和后偏移量。两名观察者使用经过验证的测量工具进行测量。还评估了在同一六个中心接受传统技术治疗的 TKA 的 BMI 和年龄匹配患者的队列,以进行比较。给出了关节线高度和后偏移量的变化和绝对变化的均值、标准差和置信区间。使用学生 t 检验比较了两种技术之间的变化。

结果

与接受传统技术 TKA 的患者相比,接受机器人辅助 TKA 的患者关节线高度和后偏移量的恢复更为准确。使用 raTKA 从术前测量的关节线高度的平均变化为-0.38mm[95%CI:-0.79 至 0.03],而传统技术为 0.91mm[0.14 至 1.68]。使用 raTKA 的关节线高度的平均绝对变化为 1.96mm[1.74 至 2.18],而传统技术为 4.00mm[3.68 至 4.32]。使用 raTKA 的后偏移量的平均变化为 0.08mm[-0.40 至 0.56],而传统技术为 1.64mm[2.47 至 0.81]。使用 raTKA 的后偏移量的平均绝对变化为 2.19mm[1.92 至 2.46],而传统技术为 4.24mm[3.79 至 4.69]。两组间关节线高度和后偏移量的绝对变化比较存在显著差异(p<0.01)。

结论

与传统基于夹具的技术相比,机器人辅助初次 TKA 更能准确地恢复关节线高度和后偏移量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d0/9409519/6462a09d8343/pone.0272722.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验