Berenson Robert A, Dowd Bryan E
Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):w29-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.w29. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
Since risk-taking, private health insurance plans were introduced into Medicare twenty-five years ago, policymakers have disagreed on these plans' fundamental purposes. Articulated objectives, which include improving quality, reducing government spending, providing additional benefits (without expanding the entitlement), increasing choices for beneficiaries, and providing benchmark competition for traditional Medicare, are plausible but sometimes conflicting. The program's history demonstrates continuous shifts in emphasis on these objectives. We enumerate the differing advantages of public and private plans in Medicare and argue that policymakers should focus their efforts on leveling the public-private playing field, thereby dealing forthrightly with the reality of growing fiscal problems.
自25年前冒险性的私人医疗保险计划被引入医疗保险制度以来,政策制定者们对这些计划的根本目的一直存在分歧。所阐明的目标,包括提高质量、减少政府开支、提供额外福利(不扩大权利范围)、为受益人增加选择,以及为传统医疗保险提供基准竞争,看似合理但有时相互冲突。该计划的历史表明,对这些目标的重视程度在不断变化。我们列举了医疗保险制度中公共和私人计划的不同优势,并认为政策制定者应致力于公平竞争环境,从而直接应对日益严重的财政问题这一现实。