Degiuli Maurizio, De Manzoni Giovanni, Di Leo Alberto, D'Ugo Domenico, Galasso Erica, Marrelli Daniele, Petrioli Roberto, Polom Karol, Roviello Franco, Santullo Francesco, Morino Mario
Maurizio Degiuli, Erica Galasso, Mario Morino, Department of Surgery, University of Turin, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):2875-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2875.
D2 procedure has been accepted in Far East as the standard treatment for both early (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC) for many decades. Recently EGC has been successfully treated with endoscopy by endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection, when restricted or extended Gotoda's criteria can be applied and D1+ surgery is offered only to patients not fitted for less invasive treatment. Furthermore, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been demonstrating the non inferiority of minimally invasive technique as compared to standard open surgery for the treatment of early cases and recently the feasibility of adequate D1+ dissection has been demonstrated also for the robot assisted technique. In case of AGC the debate on the extent of nodal dissection has been open for many decades. While D2 gastrectomy was performed as the standard procedure in eastern countries, mostly based on observational and retrospective studies, in the west the Medical Research Council (MRC), Dutch and Italian RCTs have been conducted to show a survival benefit of D2 over D1 with evidence based medicine. Unfortunately both the MRC and the Dutch trials failed to show a survival benefit after the D2 procedure, mostly due to the significant increase of postoperative morbidity and mortality, which was referred to splenopancreatectomy. Only 15 years after the conclusion of its accrual, the Dutch trial could report a significant decrease of recurrence after D2 procedure. Recently the long term survival analysis of the Italian RCT could demonstrate a benefit for patients with positive nodes treated with D2 gastrectomy without splenopancreatectomy. As nowadays also in western countries D2 procedure can be done safely with pancreas preserving technique and without preventive splenectomy, it has been suggested in several national guidelines as the recommended procedure for patients with AGC.
几十年来,D2手术在远东地区一直被视为早期(早期胃癌,EGC)和进展期胃癌(AGC)的标准治疗方法。近年来,对于EGC,如果可以应用受限或扩展的后藤标准,通过内镜黏膜切除术或内镜黏膜下剥离术可成功进行内镜治疗,仅对不适合微创治疗的患者进行D1+手术。此外,两项随机对照试验(RCT)已证明,与标准开放手术相比,微创技术在治疗早期病例方面并不逊色,最近还证明了机器人辅助技术进行充分D1+淋巴结清扫的可行性。对于AGC,关于淋巴结清扫范围的争论已经持续了几十年。在东方国家,D2胃切除术作为标准手术进行,主要基于观察性和回顾性研究;而在西方,医学研究委员会(MRC)、荷兰和意大利进行了RCT,以循证医学证明D2手术比D1手术有生存获益。不幸的是,MRC和荷兰的试验均未显示D2手术后有生存获益,主要原因是术后发病率和死亡率显著增加,这与脾胰切除术有关。荷兰试验在入组结束15年后才报告D2手术后复发率显著降低。最近,意大利RCT的长期生存分析表明,对于淋巴结阳性的患者,行保留胰腺的D2胃切除术有获益。由于如今在西方国家,D2手术也可以通过保留胰腺技术安全进行,且无需预防性脾切除术已有多项国家指南建议将其作为AGC患者的推荐手术。