Suppr超能文献

用于评估糖尿病视网膜病变的数字眼底成像与直接眼底检查的成本比较分析。

A comparative cost analysis of digital fundus imaging and direct fundus examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.

作者信息

Gomez-Ulla Francisco, Alonso Florentina, Aibar Beatriz, Gonzalez Francisco

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela and University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2008 Nov;14(9):912-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0013.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the cost between two procedures for fundus examination in patients with diabetes. In our setting, two alternatives for fundus examination are available for patients with diabetes. In the first alternative, a digital image is taken with a nonmydriatic fundus camera when the patient is at the endocrinology consultation, and the image is then examined by an ophthalmologist. In the second alternative, a direct fundus examination is made by an ophthalmologist. We calculated the costs of both procedures from both Public Healthcare System (PHS) and patient perspectives using the official scales to compute personnel, consumables, capital cost of equipment, travel expenses, and time loss of the patient caused by attending the consultation. The first alternative (digital fundus image) required 2.69, 0.03, and 1.62 Euros per patient for personnel, consumables, and capital cost of the equipment, respectively. A direct fundus examination was needed in 31% of patients that had an additional cost of 0.97 Euros per patient for the PHS plus 14.97 Euros per patient because of travel cost and loss of income. The second alternative (direct fundus examination) required 2.69, 0.11, and 0.33 Euros per patient for personnel, consumables, and capital cost, respectively. All patients in this second alternative had to attend a consultation that implied travel and loss of income costs. Attending a consultation represented a cost of 48.29 Euros per patient. From the PHS perspective, direct fundus examination is less costly than using digital fundus images. The higher cost of the digital fundus option is a consequence of the higher capital costs required by the equipment needed to obtain the digital image. However, from a global perspective, the digital image alternative is more convenient because the travel cost and loss of income of the patient are lower.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较糖尿病患者两种眼底检查方法的成本。在我们的环境中,糖尿病患者有两种眼底检查的选择。第一种选择是,患者在内分泌科会诊时使用免散瞳眼底相机拍摄数字图像,然后由眼科医生检查图像。第二种选择是由眼科医生进行直接眼底检查。我们从公共医疗系统(PHS)和患者的角度,使用官方量表计算了两种检查方法的成本,以计算人员、耗材、设备资本成本、差旅费以及患者因参加会诊而导致的时间损失。第一种选择(数字眼底图像)每位患者的人员、耗材和设备资本成本分别为2.69欧元、0.03欧元和1.62欧元。31%的患者需要进行直接眼底检查,PHS每位患者的额外成本为0.97欧元,加上每位患者因差旅费和收入损失为14.97欧元。第二种选择(直接眼底检查)每位患者的人员、耗材和资本成本分别为2.69欧元、0.11欧元和0.33欧元。第二种选择中的所有患者都必须参加会诊,这意味着差旅费和收入损失成本。参加一次会诊每位患者的成本为48.29欧元。从公共医疗系统的角度来看,直接眼底检查的成本低于使用数字眼底图像。数字眼底检查选项成本较高是因为获取数字图像所需设备的资本成本较高。然而,从总体角度来看,数字图像检查更方便,因为患者的差旅费和收入损失较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验