Remonnay Raphaël, Devaux Yves, Morelle Magali, Kante Valérie, Havet Nathalie, Carrère Marie-Odile
Université de Lyon, GATE CNRS UMR 5824 93 Chemin des Mouilles 69130 Ecully, France.
Bull Cancer. 2008 Nov;95(11):1039-45. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0748.
Home blood transfusion (HBT) is as safe and effective as hospital transfusion. If HBT can potentially cause anxiety, it can also improve patients' quality of life. The different factors influencing patients' preference for home or hospital are examined on the basis of a prospective study including 139 patients from the comprehensive cancer center of Lyon, and who received transfusions in the hospital outpatient department or at home between 2003 and 2004. A Probit model was used to identify the determinants of the choice of place of transfusion. The intensity of preference for this choice was assessed with the contingent valuation method. Of 139 patients included in the study, 97 chose HBT in the eventuality of a new transfusion. This preference was significantly related to a previous experiment of HBT and to the distance between patient's home and hospital. Mean willingness to pay was 60.9 euro for home and 47.3 euro for hospital transfusion. These results, in favour of HBT, are probably related to the strong involvement of physicians of the blood centre and their active collaboration with a high-level homecare network.
家庭输血(HBT)与医院输血一样安全有效。如果家庭输血可能会引发焦虑,那么它也能改善患者的生活质量。基于一项前瞻性研究,对影响患者选择家庭输血或医院输血的不同因素进行了调查,该研究纳入了里昂综合癌症中心的139名患者,他们在2003年至2004年间于医院门诊部或家中接受了输血治疗。采用概率单位模型来确定输血地点选择的决定因素。使用条件估值法评估了对这一选择的偏好强度。在纳入研究的139名患者中,97人在可能再次输血时选择了家庭输血。这种偏好与之前的家庭输血经历以及患者家与医院之间的距离显著相关。家庭输血的平均支付意愿为60.9欧元,医院输血为47.3欧元。这些支持家庭输血的结果,可能与血液中心医生的积极参与以及他们与高水平家庭护理网络的积极合作有关。