GATE Lyon-Saint Etienne, University of Lyon, 93 chemin des Mouilles, 69 130 Ecully, France.
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Jun;13(3):289-300. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0328-9. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
Home blood transfusion may be an interesting alternative to hospital transfusion, especially when given with curative or palliative intent or for terminal care in advanced-stage cancer patients. However, there is limited information about patients' attitude toward this type of care. The purpose of this study was to measure French cancer patients' willingness to pay (WTP) for home blood transfusion and to analyze determinants of their choice. A contingent valuation survey was administered to 139 patients receiving transfusions in the framework of a regional home care network or in the hospital outpatient department. Participation was high (90%). Most patients (65%) had received home care, including 43% blood transfusions. Just under half of the patients gave a zero WTP, among which we identified 8 protest bidders. The median WTP for home blood transfusion was 26.5
家庭输血可能是医院输血的一种有趣替代方案,尤其是在具有治疗或姑息意图或用于晚期癌症患者的终末护理时。然而,关于患者对此类护理的态度的信息有限。本研究的目的是衡量法国癌症患者对家庭输血的支付意愿(WTP),并分析其选择的决定因素。在区域家庭护理网络或医院门诊接受输血的 139 名患者中进行了条件价值评估调查。参与度很高(90%)。大多数患者(65%)接受过家庭护理,其中包括 43%的输血。几乎有一半的患者给出了零 WTP,其中我们确定了 8 个抗议出价者。家庭输血的中位 WTP 为 26.5 欧元/患者。在多变量分析中,家庭-医院距离长、生活质量差和以前的家庭护理经验被确定为决定患者在家中输血时愿意多支付多少的重要因素。这些结果表明,发展家庭服务以改善患者的幸福感是有益的,特别是对他们中最脆弱的人。以前的家庭护理经验对 WTP 的显著影响可能与血液中心医生的强烈参与以及他们对高水平家庭护理网络的积极贡献有关。我们的一些发现可能对家庭护理政策决策有用。