Moritz Andreas, Breuer Dietmar
J Environ Monit. 2008 Dec;10(12):1454-9. doi: 10.1039/b810557j. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
Workers exposed to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) very often suffer damage to health, and VOC odours may also represent a serious nuisance. The compounds concerned may be numerous and highly diverse; the concentrations of the individual substances however are generally relatively low. Quality assurance measures such as round-robin tests for the measurement of VOCs in indoor areas or at workplaces have not so far been available. A particular reason for this is the challenge presented by the production of test gases in the necessary concentrations. The BGIA test gas facility has therefore been modified for the production of test gases in the microg/m(3) range. A two-stage primary gas purifier, a continuous test gas generator with multi-stage dilution, a capillary evaporator for low-volatility compounds and an online thermodesorber have been installed specifically for this purpose.Purification of the primary gas proved to be particularly difficult: the available pre-purified compressed air contained organic trace impurities which fluctuated over time. The essential requirement, i.e. the injection into the test gas stream of a primary gas which was constant over time and exhibited the lowest possible contamination, could be satisfied only by catalytic decomposition of the organic residual impurities and with a supplementary adsorber unit. Even with these measures in place, small quantities of organic substances remain present, and the blank readings must still be monitored continuously. Following completion of all modifications, it proved possible to produce test gases with a high degree of reproducibility with substance concentrations in the range of 1 to 500 microg/m(3).Since 2007, the BGIA has been offering round-robin tests for VOCs with local sampling in the range from 5 to 50 microg/m(3). The first round-robin tests show that good results are obtained at concentrations from 10 to 50 microg/m(3). At the lower concentration of < 15 microg/m(3), however, the number of participants experiencing deviations from the reference value was substantially higher. The round-robin tests also involved the taking of blank readings prior to the start of test gas dosing. Some two-thirds of participants were unable to detect any interfering components; the remaining participants produced blank readings the levels of which could not always be explained. The problem may be caused in this case by the carrier material Tenax TA which is usually employed.
接触挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的工人常常健康受损,而且VOC气味也可能是严重的困扰。相关化合物可能种类繁多且极为多样;然而,各物质的浓度通常相对较低。到目前为止,尚无室内区域或工作场所VOC测量的循环测试等质量保证措施。造成这种情况的一个特殊原因是产生必要浓度测试气体所带来的挑战。因此,BGIA测试气体设施已进行改造,以生产微克/立方米范围内的测试气体。为此专门安装了两级初级气体净化器、带多级稀释的连续测试气体发生器、用于低挥发性化合物的毛细管蒸发器和在线热解吸仪。事实证明,初级气体的净化特别困难:现有的预净化压缩空气中含有随时间波动的有机微量杂质。只有通过有机残留杂质的催化分解和一个辅助吸附单元,才能满足基本要求,即在测试气流中注入随时间恒定且污染尽可能低的初级气体。即使采取了这些措施,仍有少量有机物质存在,空白读数仍必须持续监测。所有改造完成后,事实证明能够生产出物质浓度在1至500微克/立方米范围内、重现性很高的测试气体。自2007年以来,BGIA一直在提供5至50微克/立方米范围内本地采样的VOC循环测试。首轮循环测试表明,在10至50微克/立方米的浓度下可获得良好结果。然而,在低于15微克/立方米的较低浓度下,偏离参考值的参与者数量大幅增加。循环测试还包括在开始注入测试气体之前读取空白读数。约三分之二的参与者未检测到任何干扰成分;其余参与者产生的空白读数水平有时难以解释。在这种情况下,问题可能是由通常使用的载体材料Tenax TA引起的。