Rivera Tania L, Belmont H Michael, Malani Seema, Latorre Melissa, Benton Lauri, Weisstuch Joseph, Barisoni Laura, Tseng Chung-E, Izmirly Peter M, Buyon Jill P, Askanase Anca D
New York University School of Medicine, 560 First Avenue, TCH-407, New York, NY, USA.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Feb;36(2):298-305. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080335.
To evaluate responses to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in lupus nephritis in a multiethnic population.
This was a retrospective study of all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that underwent kidney biopsy at New York University Medical Center. Patients with followup of at least 6 months were included. Clinical response was defined as complete (return to +/- 10% of normal) or partial (improvement of 50% in abnormal renal measurements).
Ninety-nine patients were included in the study: 86% females, 86% non-Caucasian, age 34.2 +/- 1.1 years, 62% with proliferative nephritis (PN; ISN/RPS-III and IV), and 32% with membranous nephritis (MN; ISN/RPS-V). Of the 70 patients with PN, 37 were treated with CYC and 33 with MMF. The baseline characteristics of the 2 treatment groups were different in the incidence of ISN/RPS-IV, values of serum creatinine and serum albumin, and type of insurance (p < 0.05). The response rate was greater in the MMF than in the CYC group (70% vs 41%). Responses to MMF were different in Asians (11/11), Caucasians (4/5), African Americans (3/5), and Hispanics (5/11). Responses to CYC had a similar distribution (Asians 6/10, Caucasians 4/5, African Americans 4/9, Hispanics 1/11). In the MN group (N = 23) responses were similar to the PN group (73% MMF and 38% CYC). After adjusting for race, serum creatinine, serum albumin, type of insurance, and class of nephritis, in a logistic regression model, response to MMF was superior to CYC: OR 6.2 (95% CI 1.9-20.2). Hispanics had worse outcome than Caucasians (OR 0.17). Longterm followup suggested no difference in maintenance with MMF or CYC.
After controlling for the fact that less severe nephritis is preferentially treated with MMF, we found overall that response to MMF was superior to CYC. In this US population, ethnicity was observed to have an influence on response.
评估霉酚酸酯(MMF)和静脉注射环磷酰胺(CYC)对多民族人群狼疮性肾炎的疗效。
这是一项对纽约大学医学中心所有接受肾活检的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的回顾性研究。纳入随访至少6个月的患者。临床缓解定义为完全缓解(恢复至正常水平的±10%)或部分缓解(异常肾脏指标改善50%)。
99例患者纳入研究:女性占86%,非白种人占86%,年龄34.2±1.1岁,62%为增殖性肾炎(PN;ISN/RPS-III和IV型),32%为膜性肾病(MN;ISN/RPS-V型)。在70例PN患者中,37例接受CYC治疗,33例接受MMF治疗。两个治疗组的基线特征在ISN/RPS-IV型的发生率、血清肌酐和血清白蛋白值以及保险类型方面存在差异(p<0.05)。MMF组的缓解率高于CYC组(70%对41%)。MMF对亚洲人(11/11)、白种人(4/5)、非裔美国人(3/5)和西班牙裔(5/11)的疗效不同。CYC的疗效分布相似(亚洲人6/10、白种人4/5、非裔美国人4/9、西班牙裔1/11)。MN组(N = 23)的缓解情况与PN组相似(MMF组73%,CYC组38%)。在逻辑回归模型中,在对种族、血清肌酐、血清白蛋白、保险类型和肾炎类型进行校正后,MMF的疗效优于CYC:比值比6.2(95%置信区间1.9 - 20.2)。西班牙裔的预后比白种人差(比值比0.17)。长期随访表明,MMF或CYC维持治疗无差异。
在控制了轻度肾炎优先采用MMF治疗这一因素后,我们总体发现MMF的疗效优于CYC。在这个美国人群中,观察到种族对疗效有影响。