Suppr超能文献

种植体-基台界面设计会影响种植体的疲劳和断裂强度。

Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.

作者信息

Steinebrunner Lars, Wolfart Stefan, Ludwig Klaus, Kern Matthias

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1276-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01581.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Failures of implant-abutment connections are relatively frequent clinical problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of long-term dynamic loading on the fracture strength of different implant-abutment connections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six implant systems were tested: two systems with external connections (Brånemark, Compress) and four systems with internal connections (Frialit-2, Replace-Select, Camlog, Screw-Vent). Fracture strength was tested in two subgroups for each system: one subgroup with (dyn) and the other without prior dynamic loading (contr). Each subgroup consisted of eight specimens with standard implant-abutment combinations for single molar crowns. Dynamic loading was performed in a two-axis chewing simulator with 1,200,000 load cycles at 120 N.

RESULTS

Median fracture strengths in Newton (N) and 25th and 75th percentiles [in brackets] were: Brånemark: dyn=729 [0;802]/contr=782 [771;811], Frialit-2: dyn=0 [0;611]/contr=887 [798;941], Replace-Select: dyn=1439 [1403;1465]/contr=1542 [1466;1623], Camlog: dyn=1482 [1394;1544]/contr=1467 [1394;1598], Screw-Vent: dyn=0 [0;526]/contr=780 [762;847] and Compress: dyn=818[0;917]/contr=1008 [983;1028]. In some dyn subgroups, failures of the implant-abutment connection occurred already during dynamic loading: three specimens of the Brånemark and Compress groups and six specimens of the Screw-Vent and the Frialit-2 groups failed during dynamic loading. Statistically significant differences (P< or =0.05) in fracture strength could be found between groups with different connection designs.

CONCLUSION

Implant systems with long internal tube-in-tube connections and cam-slot fixation showed advantages with regard to longevity and fracture strength compared with systems with shorter internal or external connection designs.

摘要

目的

种植体-基台连接失败是较为常见的临床问题。本研究旨在评估长期动态加载对不同种植体-基台连接断裂强度的影响。

材料与方法

测试了六种种植系统:两种外部连接系统(Brånemark、Compress)和四种内部连接系统(Frialit-2、Replace-Select、Camlog、Screw-Vent)。对每个系统在两个亚组中测试断裂强度:一个亚组进行(dyn)先前的动态加载,另一个亚组不进行(contr)。每个亚组由八个具有单颗磨牙冠标准种植体-基台组合的标本组成。在两轴咀嚼模拟器中以120 N的力进行1,200,000次加载循环的动态加载。

结果

以牛顿(N)为单位的断裂强度中位数及第25和第75百分位数[方括号内]为:Brånemark:dyn = 729 [0;802]/contr = 782 [771;811],Frialit-2:dyn = 0 [0;611]/contr = 887 [798;941],Replace-Select:dyn = 1439 [1403;1465]/contr = 1542 [1466;1623],Camlog:dyn = 1482 [1394;1544]/contr = 1467 [1394;1598],Screw-Vent:dyn = 0 [0;526]/contr = 780 [762;847],Compress:dyn = 818[0;917]/contr = 1008 [983;1028]。在一些dyn亚组中,种植体-基台连接的失败在动态加载过程中就已发生:Brånemark组和Compress组有三个标本,Screw-Vent组和Frialit-2组有六个标本在动态加载过程中失败。不同连接设计的组之间在断裂强度上存在统计学显著差异(P≤0.05)。

结论

与内部或外部连接设计较短的系统相比,具有长内管-管连接和凸轮槽固定的种植系统在寿命和断裂强度方面具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验