Cameron A, Ewen M, Ross-Degnan D, Ball D, Laing R
Essential Medicines and Pharmaceutical Policies, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lancet. 2009 Jan 17;373(9659):240-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
BACKGROUND: WHO and Health Action International (HAI) have developed a standardised method for surveying medicine prices, availability, affordability, and price components in low-income and middle-income countries. Here, we present a secondary analysis of medicine availability in 45 national and subnational surveys done using the WHO/HAI methodology. METHODS: Data from 45 WHO/HAI surveys in 36 countries were adjusted for inflation or deflation and purchasing power parity. International reference prices from open international procurements for generic products were used as comparators. Results are presented for 15 medicines included in at least 80% of surveys and four individual medicines. FINDINGS: Average public sector availability of generic medicines ranged from 29.4% to 54.4% across WHO regions. Median government procurement prices for 15 generic medicines were 1.11 times corresponding international reference prices, although purchasing efficiency ranged from 0.09 to 5.37 times international reference prices. Low procurement prices did not always translate into low patient prices. Private sector patients paid 9-25 times international reference prices for lowest-priced generic products and over 20 times international reference prices for originator products across WHO regions. Treatments for acute and chronic illness were largely unaffordable in many countries. In the private sector, wholesale mark-ups ranged from 2% to 380%, whereas retail mark-ups ranged from 10% to 552%. In countries where value added tax was applied to medicines, the amount charged varied from 4% to 15%. INTERPRETATION: Overall, public and private sector prices for originator and generic medicines were substantially higher than would be expected if purchasing and distribution were efficient and mark-ups were reasonable. Policy options such as promoting generic medicines and alternative financing mechanisms are needed to increase availability, reduce prices, and improve affordability.
背景:世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际卫生行动组织(HAI)制定了一种标准化方法,用于调查低收入和中等收入国家的药品价格、可及性、可负担性及价格构成。在此,我们对采用WHO/HAI方法进行的45项国家和次国家级调查中的药品可及性进行了二次分析。 方法:对36个国家的45项WHO/HAI调查数据进行了通货膨胀或通货紧缩以及购买力平价调整。将通用产品公开国际采购的国际参考价格用作比较对象。给出了至少80%的调查中涵盖的15种药品以及4种单一药品的结果。 结果:世卫组织各区域通用药品的公共部门平均可及率在29.4%至54.4%之间。15种通用药品的政府采购价格中位数是相应国际参考价格的1.11倍,尽管采购效率在国际参考价格的0.09至5.37倍之间。低采购价格并不总是转化为低患者价格。在整个世卫组织区域,私营部门患者购买最低价格通用产品的价格是国际参考价格的9至25倍,购买原研产品的价格是国际参考价格的20倍以上。在许多国家,急性和慢性病治疗费用大多难以承受。在私营部门,批发加价幅度从2%到380%不等,而零售加价幅度从10%到552%不等。在对药品征收增值税的国家,征收金额从4%到15%不等。 解读:总体而言,如果采购和分销高效且加价合理,原研药和通用药品的公共和私营部门价格将远低于预期。需要采取促进通用药品和替代融资机制等政策选项,以提高可及性、降低价格并改善可负担性。
Indian J Med Res. 2007-5
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018-10-19
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014-6-24
Health Policy Plan. 2009-12-1
JAMA Health Forum. 2025-8-1
Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2021-9-10
Public Health Chall. 2022-6-15
BMC Res Notes. 2025-3-10