• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用国家质量论坛姑息治疗和临终关怀的最佳实践:社会工作视角

Applying the National Quality Forum Preferred Practices for Palliative and Hospice Care: a social work perspective.

作者信息

Altilio Terry, Otis-Green Shirley, Dahlin Constance M

机构信息

Department of Pain, Medicine and Palliative Care, Beth Israel Medical Center, 350 East 17th Street, Baird 12, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;4(1):3-16. doi: 10.1080/15524250802071999.

DOI:10.1080/15524250802071999
PMID:19042887
Abstract

The National Consensus Project's (NCP) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, published in 2004, defined eight domains of care essential to palliative care clinical practice. The National Quality Forum's (NQF) 2006 document, A National Framework and Preferred Practices for Palliative and Hospice Care Quality: A Consensus Report, based on the NCP's Guidelines, identified 38 evidence-based preferred practices for palliative care. This article demonstrates how the Guidelines and Preferred Practices may be operationalized in practice, focusing specifically on Domain 4 of the Guidelines, "Social Aspects of Care". Domain 4 incorporates many pertinent aspects of hospice and palliative care related to communication and care planning. In particular, emphasized is the inclusion of the patient and family in discussions about ongoing care and creation of care plans that respect the social community of patient and family.

摘要

国家共识项目(NCP)于2004年发布的《优质姑息治疗临床实践指南》定义了姑息治疗临床实践中至关重要的八个护理领域。基于NCP指南,国家质量论坛(NQF)2006年的文件《姑息与临终关怀质量的国家框架及推荐实践:共识报告》确定了38项姑息治疗的循证推荐实践。本文展示了指南和推荐实践如何在实际中得以实施,特别关注指南的第4领域“护理的社会层面”。第4领域纳入了临终关怀和姑息治疗中许多与沟通及护理计划相关的重要方面。尤其强调的是,要让患者及其家属参与关于持续护理的讨论,并制定尊重患者及其家属社会群体的护理计划。

相似文献

1
Applying the National Quality Forum Preferred Practices for Palliative and Hospice Care: a social work perspective.应用国家质量论坛姑息治疗和临终关怀的最佳实践:社会工作视角
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;4(1):3-16. doi: 10.1080/15524250802071999.
2
The national agenda for quality palliative care: the National Consensus Project and the National Quality Forum.优质姑息治疗国家议程:国家共识项目与国家质量论坛。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jun;33(6):737-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.024.
3
The national agenda for quality palliative care: promoting the National Consensus Project's domain of physical care and the National Quality Forum's preferred practices for physical aspects of care.优质姑息治疗国家议程:推动国家共识项目的身体护理领域以及国家质量论坛关于护理身体方面的首选实践。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(3):206-12. doi: 10.1080/15360280802251207.
4
Home and hospital; hospice and palliative care: how the environment impacts the social work role.家庭与医院;临终关怀与姑息治疗:环境如何影响社会工作角色。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2007;3(2):3-17. doi: 10.1300/J457v03n02_02.
5
National guidelines for palliative care: A roadmap for oncology nurses.国家姑息治疗指南:肿瘤护理人员的路线图。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2008 Feb;22(2 Suppl Nurse Ed):28-34; discussion 34-5.
6
Improving psychological and psychiatric aspects of palliative care: the national consensus project and the national quality forum preferred practices for palliative and hospice care.改善姑息治疗的心理和精神方面:国家共识项目及国家质量论坛关于姑息和临终关怀的最佳实践
Omega (Westport). 2008;57(4):323-39. doi: 10.2190/OM.57.4.a.
7
Models, standards, guidelines.模型、标准、指南。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2005 Feb;21(1):17-44, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2004.08.002.
8
Hospices' preparation and practices for quality measurement.临终关怀机构的质量测量准备和实践。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jan;39(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.003.
9
New standards and implications for improving the quality of supportive oncology practice.提高支持性肿瘤学实践质量的新标准及意义。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 10;26(23):3824-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7552.
10
The Social Work Assessment Tool (SWAT).社会工作评估工具(SWAT)。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2006;2(2):65-95. doi: 10.1300/J457v02n02_05.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating equity in performance of an electronic health record-based 6-month mortality risk model to trigger palliative care consultation: a retrospective model validation analysis.评估基于电子健康记录的 6 个月死亡率风险模型在触发姑息治疗咨询方面的表现公平性:回顾性模型验证分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Sep;32(9):503-516. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015173. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study.VOICE研究:重视意见、个体沟通与经验:为开展姑息治疗中以患者为中心的家庭会议建立证据基础——一项混合方法研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Feb 20;4:51. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0225-9. eCollection 2018.
3
Expanding the Palliative Care Domains to Meet the Needs of a Community-Based Supportive Care Model.拓展姑息治疗领域以满足基于社区的支持性护理模式的需求。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Feb;35(2):258-265. doi: 10.1177/1049909117705061. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
4
Spiritual Assessment in a Patient With Lung Cancer.肺癌患者的精神评估
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec;5(6):448-53.
5
ExCEL in Social Work: Excellence in Cancer Education & Leadership: An Oncology Social Work Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Report.社会工作卓越计划:癌症教育与领导力卓越:肿瘤社会工作对2008年医学研究所报告的回应。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Sep;30(3):503-13. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0717-8.
6
Integrating social work into palliative care for lung cancer patients and families: a multidimensional approach.将社会工作融入肺癌患者及其家庭的姑息治疗中:一种多维方法。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(4):431-46. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2014.917140.
7
Enhancing the social well-being of family caregivers.增进家庭照料者的社会福祉。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012 Nov;28(4):246-55. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2012.09.007.
8
Improving social work in intensive care unit palliative care: results of a quality improvement intervention.改善重症监护病房姑息治疗中的社会工作:质量改进干预的结果。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;13(3):297-304. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0204.