Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104-2499, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;13(3):297-304. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0204.
The intensive care unit (ICU) is a focal point for decision making in end-of-life care. Social workers are involved in providing this care for patients and families. Our goal was to examine the social worker component of an intervention to improve interdisciplinary palliative care in the ICU.
The study took place at a 350-bed hospital with 65 ICU beds. We surveyed family members and social workers caring for patients who died in the ICU or within 30 hours of transfer from ICU. Clustered regression was used to assess the effect of the intervention on three outcomes: (1) families' satisfaction with social work, (2) social workers' reported palliative and supportive activities, and (3) social workers' satisfaction with meeting family needs.
Of 590 eligible patients, 275 families completed surveys (response rate, 47%). Thirty-five social workers received 353 questionnaires concerning 353 unique patients and completed 283 (response rate, 80%). Social workers reported significant increase in the total number of activities for family members after the intervention. Some of the activities included addressing spiritual or religious needs, discussing disagreement among the family, and assuring family the patient would be kept comfortable. Neither social workers' satisfaction with meeting families' needs nor family ratings of social workers were higher after the intervention. Increased social worker experience and smaller social worker caseload were both associated with increased family satisfaction with social work.
The increase in social worker-reported activities supports the value of the interdisciplinary intervention, but we did not demonstrate improvements in other outcomes. Increased social-worker experience and decreased social worker caseload were independently associated with better family ratings of social workers suggesting future directions for interventions to improve care by social workers. Future studies will need more powerful interventions or more sensitive outcome measures to document improvements in family-assessed outcomes.
重症监护病房(ICU)是临终关怀决策的焦点。社会工作者参与为患者及其家属提供此类护理。我们的目标是研究干预措施中的社会工作者部分,以改善 ICU 中的跨学科姑息治疗。
该研究在一家拥有 350 张床位的医院和 65 张 ICU 床位的医院进行。我们调查了在 ICU 中死亡或从 ICU 转院后 30 小时内死亡的患者的家属和照顾他们的社会工作者。聚类回归用于评估干预对三个结果的影响:(1)家属对社会工作的满意度,(2)社会工作者报告的姑息和支持性活动,以及(3)社会工作者满足家庭需求的满意度。
在 590 名符合条件的患者中,有 275 个家庭完成了调查(应答率为 47%)。35 名社会工作者收到了 353 份关于 353 名患者的问卷,并完成了 283 份(应答率为 80%)。干预后,社会工作者报告为家属开展的活动总数显著增加。其中一些活动包括满足家属的精神或宗教需求、讨论家属之间的分歧以及确保家属患者会感到舒适。干预后,社会工作者满足家庭需求的满意度或家庭对社会工作者的评分均未提高。社会工作者经验的增加和社会工作者的工作量减少与家庭对社会工作者的满意度提高均有关。
增加社会工作者报告的活动支持了跨学科干预的价值,但我们没有证明其他结果有所改善。社会工作者经验的增加和工作量的减少与家庭对社会工作者的评分提高独立相关,这表明未来干预措施可以改善社会工作者的护理工作。未来的研究需要更有力的干预措施或更敏感的结果测量指标,以记录家庭评估结果的改善。