Henricson A, Linder L, Nilsson K G
Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Dec;90(12):1585-93. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20797.
We compared the performance of uncemented trabecular metal tibial components in total knee replacement with that of cemented tibial components in patients younger than 60 years over two years using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). A total of 22 consecutive patients (mean age 53 years, 33 to 59, 26 knees) received an uncemented NexGen trabecular metal cruciate-retaining monobloc tibial component and 19 (mean 53 years, 44 to 59, 21 knees) a cemented NexGen Option cruciate-retaining modular tibial component. All the trabecular metal components migrated during the initial three months and then stabilised. The exception was external rotation, which did not stabilise until 12 months. Unlike conventional metal-backed implants which displayed a tilting migration comprising subsidence and lift-off from the tibial tray, most of the trabecular metal components showed subsidence only, probably due to the elasticity of the implant. This pattern of subsidence is regarded as being beneficial for uncemented fixation.
我们采用放射立体摄影测量分析(RSA),比较了60岁以下患者在全膝关节置换中使用非骨水泥小梁金属胫骨组件与骨水泥胫骨组件的两年性能。共有22例连续患者(平均年龄53岁,33至59岁,26个膝关节)接受了非骨水泥NexGen小梁金属保留十字韧带整体胫骨组件,19例(平均53岁,44至59岁,21个膝关节)接受了骨水泥NexGen Option保留十字韧带模块化胫骨组件。所有小梁金属组件在最初三个月内均有迁移,随后稳定下来。例外的是外旋,直到12个月才稳定。与传统的金属背衬植入物不同,传统植入物表现出包括下沉和从胫骨托抬起的倾斜迁移,大多数小梁金属组件仅表现出下沉,这可能是由于植入物的弹性所致。这种下沉模式被认为有利于非骨水泥固定。