Lee Taekwan, Kim Jeansok J, Wagner Allan R
Department of Psychology, Yale University, USA.
Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;122(6):1306-17. doi: 10.1037/a0013591.
In Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning, the conditioned response (CR) is highly lateralized to the eye to which the unconditioned stimulus (US) has been directed. However, the initial conditioning of one eye can facilitate subsequent conditioning of the other eye, a phenomenon known as the intereye transfer (IET) effect. Because a conditioned emotional response (CER), as well as the eyeblink CR, is acquired during eyeblink conditioning and influences the development of the CR, the CER acquired in initial training can plausibly account for the IET effect. To evaluate this possibility, the present study utilized previously determined eyeblink conditioning procedures that effectively decouple the degree of CER and CR development to investigate the IET effect. In each of 3 experiments rabbits were initially trained with comparison procedures that differentially favored the development of the eyeblink CR or the CER, prior to a shift of the US to the alternate eye. The observed differences in the IET suggest that the effect depends largely on the specific development of eyeblink CRs rather than the CER. The neurobiological implications of this apparent bilaterality of the eyeblink CR are discussed.
在巴甫洛夫式眨眼条件反射中,条件反应(CR)高度偏向于无条件刺激(US)所指向的眼睛。然而,一只眼睛的初始条件反射可以促进另一只眼睛随后的条件反射,这种现象被称为眼间转移(IET)效应。由于在眨眼条件反射过程中会习得条件性情绪反应(CER)以及眨眼CR,并且CER会影响CR的发展,所以在初始训练中习得的CER有可能解释IET效应。为了评估这种可能性,本研究采用了先前确定的眨眼条件反射程序,这些程序有效地将CER和CR发展的程度解耦,以研究IET效应。在3个实验中的每一个实验里,兔子首先接受比较程序的训练,这些程序在将US转移到另一只眼睛之前,会不同程度地促进眨眼CR或CER的发展。观察到的IET差异表明,该效应在很大程度上取决于眨眼CR的具体发展,而非CER。本文讨论了眨眼CR这种明显双侧性的神经生物学意义。