Zier Judith L, Rivard Patrick F, Krach Linda E, Wendorf Heather R
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St Paul, MN, USA.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Nov;50(11):854-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03069.x.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy of inhaled nitrous oxide (N(2)O) with enteral midazolam for sedation of children with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injections. Fifty children (29 males, 21 females; mean age 8y 2mo [SD 4y 5mo]; range 1-16y) were randomized to sedation with N(2)O (n=25) or midazolam (n=25). Groups were similar in type of CP (diplegia, 11; triplegia, three; quadriplegia, 16; hemiplegia, 16; other, three) and Gross Motor Function Classification System level (Level I, 4; II, 24; III, 4; IV, 13; V, 5). Both groups were equally sedated at time of injection (p=0.661), but those in the midazolam group were more sedated at time of discharge (p<0.001). N(2)O was more effective in reducing pain compared with midazolam as measured using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale (p=0.010), parental estimate of pain (p=0.009), and nursing estimate of pain (p=0.007). Parents in the N(2)O group rated it better than prior sedation with midazolam for BoNT-A injections (p=0.031). Physicians and nurses reported no difference in ease of procedure between the groups. One child in the midazolam group and eight in the N(2)O group had adverse effects, all of which resolved promptly. N(2)O appears to be an effective means of sedation for children undergoing outpatient BoNT-A injections.
这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究比较了吸入一氧化二氮(N₂O)与肠内咪达唑仑对接受A型肉毒毒素(BoNT-A)注射的脑瘫(CP)儿童进行镇静的效果。50名儿童(29名男性,21名女性;平均年龄8岁2个月[标准差4岁5个月];范围1 - 16岁)被随机分为接受N₂O镇静组(n = 25)或咪达唑仑镇静组(n = 25)。两组在脑瘫类型(双瘫,11例;三肢瘫,3例;四肢瘫,16例;偏瘫,16例;其他,3例)和粗大运动功能分类系统水平(I级,4例;II级,24例;III级,4例;IV级,13例;V级,5例)方面相似。两组在注射时的镇静程度相同(p = 0.661),但咪达唑仑组在出院时镇静程度更高(p < 0.001)。使用面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安慰度(FLACC)量表测量,N₂O在减轻疼痛方面比咪达唑仑更有效(p = 0.010),家长对疼痛的评估(p = 0.009)以及护士对疼痛的评估(p = 0.007)。N₂O组的家长对其评价优于之前BoNT-A注射时使用咪达唑仑的镇静效果(p = 0.031)。医生和护士报告两组在操作的难易程度上没有差异。咪达唑仑组有1名儿童出现不良反应,N₂O组有8名儿童出现不良反应,所有不良反应均迅速缓解。对于接受门诊BoNT-A注射的儿童,N₂O似乎是一种有效的镇静方法。